H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Elena Dementieva H2H: 3-5

Elena Dementieva holds a 5–3 lead over Samantha Stosur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Elena Dementieva leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Samantha Stosur leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2010 WTA Championships round-robin match 4-6 6-4 7-6(4).

AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 25, 2010 WTA Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Elena Dementieva #9 4-6 6-4 7-6(4) Samantha Stosur #7 Match data
Sep 7, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Samantha Stosur #6 6-3 2-6 7-6(2) Elena Dementieva #12 Match data
Aug 22, 2009* Toronto WTA 1000 QF Hard Elena Dementieva #5 6-7(3) 6-1 6-3 Samantha Stosur #17 Match data
May 30, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Samantha Stosur #32 6-3 4-6 6-1 Elena Dementieva #4 Match data
Jan 24, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Elena Dementieva #4 7-6(6) 6-4 Samantha Stosur #48 Match data
Sep 29, 2006* Luxembourg WTA 500 R16 Hard Elena Dementieva #6 7-5 6-1 Samantha Stosur #30 Match data
Aug 11, 2005* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Elena Dementieva #6 6-4 6-3 Samantha Stosur #54 Match data
Jan 15, 2005* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard Samantha Stosur #59 (w/o) Elena Dementieva #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,108 472 243 66.0% 0 3 0 9 3 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Elena Dementieva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,584 0 0
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0 2000 33–19 63.5% #11 1,859 0 0
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,833 0 0
20 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,763 0 0
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0 2004 40–22 64.5% #6 1,986 0 4
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,925 0 4
24 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,908 0 6
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,964 0 8
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2 2008 50–17 74.6% #4 2,014 0 10
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,981 0 13
28 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,928 0 15
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8
32 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9
34 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9
35 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9
37 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9