H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Elena Vesnina H2H: 3-2

Samantha Stosur holds a 3–2 lead over Elena Vesnina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Samantha Stosur leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2014 Rome third round 6-2 6-3.

AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 15, 2014* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Samantha Stosur #18 6-2 6-3 Elena Vesnina #33 Match data
Oct 28, 2013 Tournament of Champions WTA Finals RR Hard Samantha Stosur #19 6-3 6-3 Elena Vesnina #25 Match data
Apr 8, 2011* Charleston WTA 500 R16 Clay Elena Vesnina #56 6-4 6-1 Samantha Stosur #5 Match data
Sep 1, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Samantha Stosur #6 3-6 7-6(2) 6-1 Elena Vesnina #64 Match data
Aug 28, 2009* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Elena Vesnina #32 3-6 6-3 6-4 Samantha Stosur #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9
Elena Vesnina #573 #13 3,320 1,858 262 260 50.2% 0 1 0 1 1 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Elena Vesnina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #259 1,485 0 0
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0 2005 6–6 50.0% #106 1,511 0 0
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0 2006 20–24 45.5% #47 1,617 0 0
20 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0 2007 17–21 44.7% #54 1,631 0 0
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0 2008 12–19 38.7% #79 1,558 0 0
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0 2009 31–20 60.8% #23 1,767 0 0
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0 2010 22–22 50.0% #52 1,720 0 0
24 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0 2011 19–21 47.5% #57 1,689 0 0
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1 2012 14–17 45.2% #68 1,701 0 0
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2 2013 30–19 61.2% #25 1,801 0 2
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3 2014 16–17 48.5% #64 1,689 0 2
28 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3 2015 11–17 39.3% #115 1,609 0 2
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5 2016 28–16 63.6% #16 1,778 0 2
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6 2017 25–26 49.0% #18 1,691 0 3
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8 2018 8–11 42.1% #137 1,679 0 3
32 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9
34 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9 2021 3–3 50.0% #310 1,689 0 3
35 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9
37 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9