H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Samantha Stosur vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 3-7
Jelena Jankovic holds a 7–3 lead over Samantha Stosur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 5–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2017 Charleston third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
7
10 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2017* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-1 6-3 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Jelena Jankovic | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2013* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Jelena Jankovic | 6-4 6-4 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2012* | Dubai | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-4 6-2 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2011* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Jun 4, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-1 6-2 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2010* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-1 7-6(9) | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2010* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-2 6-4 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2007* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-2 7-6(2) | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2006* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-4 6-1 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Stosur | #531 | #4 | 6,195 | 2,068 | 451 | 335 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Stosur | Jelena Jankovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #46 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #29 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2007 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2008 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #52 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2009 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2010 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #6 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2011 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 1,977 | 1 | 3 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2012 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #9 | 1,883 | 1 | 3 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,902 | 1 | 5 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 2014 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,883 | 1 | 6 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | 2015 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #27 | 1,789 | 1 | 8 | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 2016 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,716 | 1 | 8 | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2017 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,734 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2018 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #74 | 1,663 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #99 | 1,631 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,607 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #382 | 1,522 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #529 | 1,511 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |