H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Jie Zheng H2H: 3-3

Samantha Stosur and Jie Zheng are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2013 Australian Open second round 6-4 1-6 7-5.

AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jie Zheng #40 6-4 1-6 7-5 Samantha Stosur #9 Match data
Jan 10, 2013* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Jie Zheng #42 6-3 6-7(7) 6-4 Samantha Stosur #9 Match data
Oct 15, 2011* Osaka WTA 250 SF Hard Samantha Stosur #6 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 Jie Zheng #58 Match data
Mar 23, 2011* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Samantha Stosur #5 6-2 6-1 Jie Zheng #59 Match data
Aug 8, 2009* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Samantha Stosur #19 4-6 6-3 6-4 Jie Zheng #23 Match data
Feb 19, 2009* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Jie Zheng #20 3-6 7-5 7-5 Samantha Stosur #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,898 216 193 52.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Jie Zheng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,507 0 0
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0
20 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0 2004 10–17 37.0% #79 1,551 0 0
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,705 0 1
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,778 0 3
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3
24 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0 2008 20–10 66.7% #25 1,838 0 3
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,779 0 3
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,760 0 3
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3
28 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3 2012 25–23 52.1% #26 1,658 0 4
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,688 0 4
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4
32 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9
34 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9
35 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9
37 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9