H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Samantha Stosur vs Jill Craybas H2H: 2-0
Samantha Stosur holds a 2–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Samantha Stosur leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2009 Osaka quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2009* | Osaka | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-1 6-3 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2008* | Seoul | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-0 6-1 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Stosur | #531 | #4 | 6,195 | 2,068 | 451 | 335 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Stosur | Jill Craybas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #46 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #29 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #52 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #6 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 1,977 | 1 | 3 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2012 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #9 | 1,883 | 1 | 3 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,902 | 1 | 5 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2014 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,883 | 1 | 6 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2015 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #27 | 1,789 | 1 | 8 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2016 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,716 | 1 | 8 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2017 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,734 | 1 | 9 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2018 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #74 | 1,663 | 1 | 9 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2019 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #99 | 1,631 | 1 | 9 | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,607 | 1 | 9 | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #382 | 1,522 | 1 | 9 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #529 | 1,511 | 1 | 9 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |