H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 2-3

Lindsay Davenport holds a 3–2 lead over Samantha Stosur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2006 New Haven semifinal 7-6(3) 7-6(7).

AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 26, 2006* New Haven WTA 500 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #11 7-6(3) 7-6(7) Samantha Stosur #36 Match data
Aug 10, 2006* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Samantha Stosur #37 6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #10 Match data
Jan 15, 2005* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Samantha Stosur #59 (w/o) Lindsay Davenport #1 Match data
Mar 13, 2004* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 6-0 6-3 Samantha Stosur #114 Match data
Jun 25, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Lindsay Davenport #5 7-6(3) 7-5 Samantha Stosur #147 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9
34 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9
35 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9
37 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9