H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Lucie Hradecka H2H: 1-1

Samantha Stosur and Lucie Hradecka are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on clay, while Samantha Stosur leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Hradecka won the 2012 Madrid quarterfinal 7-6(8) 7-6(6).

AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 12, 2012* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Lucie Hradecka #105 7-6(8) 7-6(6) Samantha Stosur #5 Match data
Jan 6, 2011* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Hard Samantha Stosur #6 7-6(1) 6-1 Lucie Hradecka #110 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9
Lucie Hradecka #1,142 #41 1,271 1,726 92 120 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Lucie Hradecka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0
20 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #220 1,491 0 0
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #223 1,476 0 0
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0 2008 4–3 57.1% #118 1,522 0 0
24 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0 2009 14–11 56.0% #64 1,599 0 0
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1 2010 5–17 22.7% #110 1,498 0 0
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2 2011 16–20 44.4% #52 1,580 0 0
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3 2012 18–17 51.4% #46 1,653 0 0
28 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3 2013 5–11 31.2% #148 1,562 0 0
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5 2014 3–3 50.0% #154 1,587 0 0
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6 2015 17–17 50.0% #53 1,641 0 0
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8 2016 5–13 27.8% #166 1,586 0 0
32 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8 2017 4–3 57.1% #193 1,621 0 0
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9
34 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9 2019 0–1 0.0% #302 1,615 0 0
35 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9 2021 0–1 0.0% #567 1,549 0 0
37 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9