H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Marion Bartoli H2H: 3-3

Samantha Stosur and Marion Bartoli are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Samantha Stosur leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2012 Qatar Open semifinal 6-3 0-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Samantha Stosur
AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main-draw meetings
Marion Bartoli
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Samantha Stosur #5 6-3 0-0 (ret.) Marion Bartoli #7 Match data Feb 18, 2012* SF Qatar Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Marion Bartoli #11 6-3 6-1 Samantha Stosur #6 Match data Oct 16, 2011* F Japan Women's Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Marion Bartoli #9 6-3 6-1 Samantha Stosur #10 Match data Jun 18, 2011* SF Eastbourne Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Samantha Stosur #10 6-2 6-1 Marion Bartoli #13 Match data Apr 29, 2010* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Marion Bartoli #14 6-3 1-6 6-1 Samantha Stosur #20 Match data Aug 1, 2009* SF Bank of the West Classic Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Samantha Stosur #36 7-6(2) 6-0 Marion Bartoli #27 Match data Aug 26, 2006* QF New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,072 459 345 57.1% 1 0 0 2 6 9
Marion Bartoli #13 #7 5,160 1,993 402 267 60.1% 1 0 0 2 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Marion Bartoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #307 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 2–3 40.0% #104 1,511 0 0
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0 2003 20–21 48.8% #58 1,636 0 0
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,493 0 0 2004 26–23 53.1% #41 1,674 0 0
20 2004 17–17 50.0% #65 1,605 0 0 2005 26–25 51.0% #37 1,632 0 0
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,588 0 0 2006 45–28 61.6% #18 1,801 0 3
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,747 0 0 2007 47–31 60.3% #10 1,875 0 3
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,724 0 0 2008 30–26 53.6% #17 1,806 0 3
24 2008 18–12 60.0% #52 1,754 0 0 2009 46–22 67.6% #11 1,884 0 5
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,887 0 1 2010 36–21 63.2% #16 1,815 0 5
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,931 0 2 2011 60–26 69.8% #9 1,926 0 7
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,967 1 3 2012 41–25 62.1% #11 1,819 0 7
28 2012 40–24 62.5% #9 1,873 1 3 2013 23–15 60.5% #13 1,802 1 8
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,904 1 5 — — — — — — —
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,860 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,782 1 8 — — — — — — —
32 2016 30–23 56.6% #21 1,702 1 8 — — — — — — —
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,731 1 9 — — — — — — —
34 2018 17–24 41.5% #74 1,655 1 9 — — — — — — —
35 2019 15–17 46.9% #99 1,631 1 9 — — — — — — —
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9 — — — — — — —
37 2021 1–10 9.1% #382 1,518 1 9 — — — — — — —
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,506 1 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Samantha Stosur Marion Bartoli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 13 11 24 54.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2003 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 21 15 36 58.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2004 12 11 23 52.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 21 20 41 51.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2005 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 37 17 54 68.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2006 18 15 33 54.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2007 21 20 41 51.2% 14 7 21 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 21 16 37 56.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2008 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2009 34 14 48 70.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2009 29 14 43 67.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 27 14 41 65.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
26 2010 22 14 36 61.1% 18 3 21 85.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 39 18 57 68.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
27 2011 31 14 45 68.9% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 31 16 47 66.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2012 25 16 41 61.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 10 9 19 52.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2013 31 15 46 67.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 23 14 37 62.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 16 5 21 76.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 11 15 26 42.3% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 10 13 23 43.5% 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 3 13 16 18.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 9 11 20 45.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 274 224 498 55.0% 143 76 219 65.3% 36 41 77 46.8% 6 4 10 60.0% — 277 172 449 61.7% 56 61 117 47.9% 58 25 83 69.9% 11 9 20 55.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 648/803 of Samantha Stosur's and 460/663 of Marion Bartoli's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Samantha Stosur Marion Bartoli
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/41 2.0 3.5 61.8% 57.6% 36.8% 60.4% 56.3% 49.9% 41.0%
19 2003 1/6 6.0 5.0 49.4% 74.4% 35.0% 33.3% 33.3% 54.4% 38.2% 2004 5/49 1.4 3.6 64.9% 56.3% 43.5% 64.9% 57.5% 51.9% 47.3%
20 2004 5/34 2.2 2.4 49.6% 64.1% 45.0% 55.6% 30.1% 54.4% 34.4% 2005 9/51 0.8 1.3 69.1% 57.1% 43.5% 51.2% 51.4% 52.7% 48.9%
21 2005 9/40 4.7 4.4 56.5% 70.7% 48.7% 49.9% 46.1% 61.2% 40.8% 2006 38/73 1.4 2.5 68.5% 60.5% 45.0% 53.5% 47.4% 55.7% 45.6%
22 2006 36/53 4.1 2.3 61.8% 64.6% 47.1% 51.1% 39.0% 58.2% 38.5% 2007 70/78 1.7 3.1 66.7% 63.9% 44.6% 52.7% 50.5% 57.5% 46.4%
23 2007 29/30 4.4 2.9 60.9% 66.0% 45.8% 59.0% 45.7% 57.6% 38.6% 2008 54/56 2.0 4.3 62.5% 64.0% 44.4% 47.8% 46.1% 56.5% 45.5%
24 2008 24/30 5.1 3.5 51.9% 71.1% 51.5% 59.2% 42.5% 61.4% 42.9% 2009 61/68 2.2 4.3 61.0% 65.9% 45.5% 45.9% 51.9% 58.1% 48.7%
25 2009 52/58 4.8 3.5 58.8% 68.8% 50.7% 61.2% 53.9% 61.1% 43.5% 2010 51/57 3.3 4.7 59.7% 70.0% 47.7% 48.2% 50.8% 60.8% 45.5%
26 2010 59/62 4.8 3.2 60.0% 70.7% 51.5% 57.8% 49.4% 63.0% 42.8% 2011 73/86 3.1 4.5 59.0% 68.8% 47.3% 56.8% 53.1% 59.8% 49.3%
27 2011 59/67 3.2 2.1 63.5% 71.2% 53.3% 62.1% 48.8% 64.6% 42.2% 2012 63/66 2.7 6.7 57.6% 66.8% 43.6% 52.6% 52.1% 56.9% 46.9%
28 2012 57/64 3.8 3.2 64.6% 68.1% 51.2% 59.1% 44.5% 62.1% 43.0% 2013 32/38 2.3 7.6 58.5% 66.7% 44.0% 55.3% 53.1% 57.5% 46.8%
29 2013 56/62 2.9 3.7 61.8% 68.1% 48.2% 61.2% 50.2% 60.3% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 51/54 4.4 2.8 61.7% 69.1% 51.1% 55.0% 50.9% 62.3% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 43/56 4.7 3.4 60.4% 69.7% 59.1% 58.6% 45.0% 65.5% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 40/53 3.5 4.8 60.5% 64.9% 45.1% 52.4% 46.1% 57.1% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 39/41 3.8 2.9 62.6% 67.3% 48.7% 54.2% 47.9% 60.4% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 40/42 4.1 3.3 60.6% 65.0% 47.7% 50.5% 45.7% 58.2% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 30/32 4.2 4.5 58.8% 65.9% 40.1% 52.8% 41.5% 55.3% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 4/4 2.3 3.8 69.9% 61.3% 34.5% 40.5% 31.5% 53.8% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 10/11 2.8 3.7 64.7% 59.4% 36.6% 53.1% 31.7% 51.3% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 4/4 3.8 4.3 59.3% 59.0% 38.3% 25.7% 34.2% 51.4% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 648/805 4.0 3.3 60.9% 67.9% 49.4% 56.7% 46.6% 60.6% 41.7% — 460/669 2.4 4.5 61.8% 65.6% 45.2% 51.8% 50.9% 57.7% 47.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Samantha Stosur Marion Bartoli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1484 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.20
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1512 120.3 — — — — +49 — — 46.2% -0.08 1–2 (33%) — — -0.04
18 2002 1476 94.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 — — +0.06 2003 1637 133.4 -0.70 +0.08 0.819 46.0% +31 -124 -53 48.3% -0.21 6–7 (46%) 8–1 (89%) 105.6 -0.73
19 2003 1493 117.7 +0.87 +0.74 0.837 46.5% +24 — — 35.7% 0.00 1–1 0–5 (0%) — -0.19 2004 1674 131.9 -1.04 +1.09 0.984 50.1% +23 -166 -97 58.8% +0.71 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.44
20 2004 1606 118.2 -0.27 -2.88 0.756 44.8% +5 -91 -21 51.3% -0.46 3–5 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -1.27 2005 1632 133.1 -1.32 +1.68 1.034 50.8% +17 — -23 55.0% +0.78 5–7 (42%) 2–7 (22%) 94.0 +1.61
21 2005 1589 131.3 +2.67 -1.67 1.051 50.5% +30 -61 -33 44.9% -0.27 5–8 (38%) 6–10 (38%) 95.4 -0.78 2006 1801 139.5 -0.51 +0.92 1.028 50.7% +32 -303 -174 60.1% +0.86 11–9 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 +3.77
22 2006 1748 143.1 +1.45 -3.76 0.920 48.0% +2 -155 -135 52.2% +0.09 7–6 (54%) 3–8 (27%) 98.8 -0.70 2007 1875 142.0 +2.12 +2.52 1.092 51.8% -79 -152 +82 59.0% +0.72 12–8 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 102.9 +1.20
23 2007 1724 135.6 +1.83 -2.92 0.911 48.6% -2 -43 -124 50.7% +0.19 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 98.6 -2.25 2008 1807 142.6 +1.65 +1.46 1.045 50.9% +6 -164 +85 56.1% +0.28 8–11 (42%) 9–3 (75%) 99.2 +2.91
24 2008 1755 134.8 +4.41 +0.22 1.111 52.1% -11 -77 -81 58.1% +0.69 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 96.0 -0.47 2009 1885 150.4 +2.39 +4.50 1.163 53.2% +28 -227 -2 67.1% +1.29 14–4 (78%) 6–3 (67%) 110.3 +1.28
25 2009 1888 154.7 +5.39 +0.57 1.119 52.5% -7 -129 -180 63.0% +0.94 10–11 (48%) 10–5 (67%) 104.0 -1.65 2010 1815 147.0 +4.48 +1.93 1.161 53.0% +45 -192 +84 63.8% +0.97 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 95.4 +2.32
26 2010 1932 159.5 +7.09 +0.23 1.156 52.9% -40 +78 -207 63.9% +1.12 14–6 (70%) 10–9 (53%) 107.5 -1.75 2011 1927 155.9 +4.15 +5.80 1.227 54.4% -14 -156 +107 65.1% +1.25 15–6 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 108.8 -1.14
27 2011 1968 158.2 +8.42 -0.10 1.193 53.4% -20 +28 -223 64.2% +1.11 12–7 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 102.1 -0.95 2012 1820 145.9 +1.09 +3.31 1.088 51.8% +54 -143 +153 60.5% +0.76 12–7 (63%) 6–2 (75%) 102.8 +4.07
28 2012 1873 150.5 +5.95 +0.23 1.134 52.5% +7 +160 -197 58.8% +0.71 13–11 (54%) 8–14 (36%) 93.9 +1.71 2013 1803 132.3 +1.80 +2.75 1.100 52.3% -34 -141 +327 63.5% +0.66 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 98.6 +1.37
29 2013 1904 152.1 +4.49 +1.51 1.138 52.7% +14 +46 -214 63.6% +1.01 11–9 (55%) 6–4 (60%) 99.3 +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1860 149.0 +5.95 +0.29 1.140 52.5% +6 +80 -205 59.0% +0.65 6–12 (33%) 7–6 (54%) 90.0 -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1783 141.4 +5.95 +0.02 1.201 53.3% -26 +170 -121 55.7% +0.79 10–6 (63%) 3–8 (27%) 96.9 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1702 133.6 +1.07 -2.01 0.933 48.8% -49 +307 -57 50.9% -0.12 12–4 (75%) 7–8 (47%) 102.9 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1732 137.4 +3.91 +0.24 1.115 52.4% -86 +251 — 55.6% +0.41 6–11 (35%) 6–0 (100%) 99.3 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 1655 126.0 +1.35 -4.20 0.900 48.1% -67 +228 +30 40.0% -0.64 3–4 (43%) 2–7 (22%) 93.2 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1631 116.9 -0.46 -2.06 0.900 47.9% -38 +150 +51 46.7% -0.59 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 106.9 +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1607 111.3 -1.57 -0.87 0.795 45.4% -26 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 2–0 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1518 99.9 -2.40 -3.51 0.673 42.9% -10 — +80 20.0% -2.40 0–3 (0%) — — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1506 100.9 -2.15 -2.55 0.791 45.1% +8 — — 22.2% -1.55 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2072 148.5 +4.28 -0.68 1.059 51.2% -13 +101 -98 55.2% +0.39 127–118 (52%) 95–103 (48%) 95.8 -0.97 — 1993 148.0 +2.18 +3.05 1.112 52.3% +12 -176 +67 60.1% +0.77 93–77 (55%) 58–37 (61%) 105.9 +2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.