H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Monica Puig H2H: 4-3

Samantha Stosur holds a 4–3 lead over Monica Puig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Monica Puig leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Samantha Stosur leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2018 Miami Open first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Samantha Stosur
AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main-draw meetings
Monica Puig
PUR Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Puig #82 6-3 6-4 Samantha Stosur #45 Match data Mar 22, 2018* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Monica Puig #58 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 Samantha Stosur #41 Match data Jan 17, 2018* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Monica Puig #94 6-4 6-4 Samantha Stosur #27 Match data Jan 14, 2016* QF Sydney International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Samantha Stosur #28 6-4 6-4 Monica Puig #92 Match data Oct 16, 2015* R16 Hong Kong Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Samantha Stosur #26 6-0 6-3 Monica Puig #57 Match data May 20, 2015* R32 Strasbourg Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Samantha Stosur #21 6-2 6-2 Monica Puig #67 Match data Aug 6, 2014* R64 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Samantha Stosur #18 6-1 6-1 Monica Puig #41 Match data May 28, 2014* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,072 459 345 57.1% 1 0 0 0 2 6 9
Monica Puig #1,073 #27 1,570 1,843 139 140 49.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Monica Puig
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #211 1,492 0 0
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,493 0 0 2013 13–15 46.4% #56 1,570 0 0
20 2004 17–17 50.0% #65 1,605 0 0 2014 16–18 47.1% #59 1,614 0 1
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,588 0 0 2015 15–23 39.5% #92 1,578 0 1
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,747 0 0 2016 41–24 63.1% #32 1,770 0 2
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,724 0 0 2017 20–21 48.8% #58 1,724 0 2
24 2008 18–12 60.0% #52 1,754 0 0 2018 18–14 56.2% #53 1,780 0 2
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,887 0 1 2019 16–19 45.7% #79 1,686 0 2
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,931 0 2 2020 0–2 0.0% #105 1,623 0 2
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,967 1 3 — — — — — — —
28 2012 40–24 62.5% #9 1,873 1 3 2022 0–1 0.0% #1073 1,619 0 2
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,904 1 5 — — — — — — —
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,860 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,782 1 8 — — — — — — —
32 2016 30–23 56.6% #21 1,702 1 8 — — — — — — —
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,731 1 9 — — — — — — —
34 2018 17–24 41.5% #74 1,655 1 9 — — — — — — —
35 2019 15–17 46.9% #99 1,631 1 9 — — — — — — —
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9 — — — — — — —
37 2021 1–10 9.1% #382 1,518 1 9 — — — — — — —
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,506 1 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Samantha Stosur Monica Puig
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 5 11 16 31.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
20 2004 12 11 23 52.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 9 12 21 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
21 2005 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
22 2006 18 15 33 54.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2016 25 14 39 64.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
23 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2017 17 15 32 53.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2008 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2018 17 12 29 58.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2009 29 14 43 67.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2019 7 13 20 35.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2010 22 14 36 61.1% 18 3 21 85.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2011 31 14 45 68.9% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 25 16 41 61.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2013 31 15 46 67.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 23 14 37 62.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 16 5 21 76.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 11 15 26 42.3% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 10 13 23 43.5% 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 3 13 16 18.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 9 11 20 45.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 274 224 498 55.0% 143 76 219 65.3% 36 41 77 46.8% 6 4 10 60.0% — 91 94 185 49.2% 34 30 64 53.1% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 648/803 of Samantha Stosur's and 252/279 of Monica Puig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Samantha Stosur Monica Puig
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 2.0 7.0 59.8% 64.5% 41.2% 53.8% 50.0% 55.1% 45.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/2 4.0 3.0 50.0% 62.5% 53.1% 75.0% 0.0% 57.8% 30.0%
19 2003 1/6 6.0 5.0 49.4% 74.4% 35.0% 33.3% 33.3% 54.4% 38.2% 2013 27/28 2.7 2.7 62.4% 62.4% 51.4% 41.8% 51.2% 58.1% 43.0%
20 2004 5/34 2.2 2.4 49.6% 64.1% 45.0% 55.6% 30.1% 54.4% 34.4% 2014 33/34 3.1 4.4 59.8% 66.4% 46.7% 51.1% 46.9% 58.4% 42.7%
21 2005 9/40 4.7 4.4 56.5% 70.7% 48.7% 49.9% 46.1% 61.2% 40.8% 2015 32/38 4.4 4.0 60.7% 65.2% 51.0% 50.2% 49.1% 59.4% 38.4%
22 2006 36/53 4.1 2.3 61.8% 64.6% 47.1% 51.1% 39.0% 58.2% 38.5% 2016 52/65 3.1 3.6 62.0% 64.8% 49.8% 58.7% 46.5% 59.0% 44.7%
23 2007 29/30 4.4 2.9 60.9% 66.0% 45.8% 59.0% 45.7% 57.6% 38.6% 2017 39/41 3.3 3.4 60.1% 65.6% 47.8% 54.0% 45.1% 58.7% 42.8%
24 2008 24/30 5.1 3.5 51.9% 71.1% 51.5% 59.2% 42.5% 61.4% 42.9% 2018 31/32 3.0 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 45.7% 52.7% 48.6% 58.6% 42.1%
25 2009 52/58 4.8 3.5 58.8% 68.8% 50.7% 61.2% 53.9% 61.1% 43.5% 2019 33/35 3.3 3.6 62.5% 66.1% 48.0% 60.1% 51.9% 59.1% 44.1%
26 2010 59/62 4.8 3.2 60.0% 70.7% 51.5% 57.8% 49.4% 63.0% 42.8% 2020 2/2 1.5 6.0 64.6% 55.7% 28.2% 29.8% 28.6% 46.0% 34.8%
27 2011 59/67 3.2 2.1 63.5% 71.2% 53.3% 62.1% 48.8% 64.6% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 57/64 3.8 3.2 64.6% 68.1% 51.2% 59.1% 44.5% 62.1% 43.0% 2022 1/1 0.0 5.0 60.3% 51.2% 33.3% 53.8% 33.3% 44.1% 32.7%
29 2013 56/62 2.9 3.7 61.8% 68.1% 48.2% 61.2% 50.2% 60.3% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 51/54 4.4 2.8 61.7% 69.1% 51.1% 55.0% 50.9% 62.3% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 43/56 4.7 3.4 60.4% 69.7% 59.1% 58.6% 45.0% 65.5% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 40/53 3.5 4.8 60.5% 64.9% 45.1% 52.4% 46.1% 57.1% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 39/41 3.8 2.9 62.6% 67.3% 48.7% 54.2% 47.9% 60.4% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 40/42 4.1 3.3 60.6% 65.0% 47.7% 50.5% 45.7% 58.2% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 30/32 4.2 4.5 58.8% 65.9% 40.1% 52.8% 41.5% 55.3% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 4/4 2.3 3.8 69.9% 61.3% 34.5% 40.5% 31.5% 53.8% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 10/11 2.8 3.7 64.7% 59.4% 36.6% 53.1% 31.7% 51.3% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 4/4 3.8 4.3 59.3% 59.0% 38.3% 25.7% 34.2% 51.4% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 648/805 4.0 3.3 60.9% 67.9% 49.4% 56.7% 46.6% 60.6% 41.7% — 252/279 3.2 3.6 61.2% 65.2% 48.4% 53.3% 47.8% 58.6% 42.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Samantha Stosur Monica Puig
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1492 103.5 -1.04 -2.47 1.020 50.6% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.15
18 2002 1476 94.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 — — +0.06 2012 1464 94.8 -3.46 -3.96 0.711 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17
19 2003 1493 117.7 +0.87 +0.74 0.837 46.5% +24 — — 35.7% 0.00 1–1 0–5 (0%) — -0.19 2013 1571 123.3 +1.46 -0.93 1.027 50.5% -93 +68 +69 50.0% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 101.7 +0.09
20 2004 1606 118.2 -0.27 -2.88 0.756 44.8% +5 -91 -21 51.3% -0.46 3–5 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -1.27 2014 1615 129.5 +1.33 -0.33 1.027 50.6% -75 +119 0 48.7% +0.15 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.29
21 2005 1589 131.3 +2.67 -1.67 1.051 50.5% +30 -61 -33 44.9% -0.27 5–8 (38%) 6–10 (38%) 95.4 -0.78 2015 1579 121.9 +0.62 -2.26 0.948 49.1% +9 +55 -13 42.4% -0.19 3–8 (27%) 5–11 (31%) 91.9 -0.38
22 2006 1748 143.1 +1.45 -3.76 0.920 48.0% +2 -155 -135 52.2% +0.09 7–6 (54%) 3–8 (27%) 98.8 -0.70 2016 1771 137.9 +2.19 +1.46 1.092 52.0% -9 -57 -89 58.9% +0.70 12–5 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 108.8 -0.14
23 2007 1724 135.6 +1.83 -2.92 0.911 48.6% -2 -43 -124 50.7% +0.19 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 98.6 -2.25 2017 1724 133.3 +2.17 -0.36 1.036 50.7% +15 -63 — 47.4% -0.04 8–9 (47%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 -0.88
24 2008 1755 134.8 +4.41 +0.22 1.111 52.1% -11 -77 -81 58.1% +0.69 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 96.0 -0.47 2018 1780 137.8 +0.96 +0.23 1.017 50.5% +6 — — 56.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.8 -0.76
25 2009 1888 154.7 +5.39 +0.57 1.119 52.5% -7 -129 -180 63.0% +0.94 10–11 (48%) 10–5 (67%) 104.0 -1.65 2019 1686 127.3 +1.69 +0.90 1.076 51.5% -34 +39 -64 50.0% +0.35 4–8 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 92.6 -0.89
26 2010 1932 159.5 +7.09 +0.23 1.156 52.9% -40 +78 -207 63.9% +1.12 14–6 (70%) 10–9 (53%) 107.5 -1.75 2020 1624 94.4 -0.47 -3.91 0.644 40.5% — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 — +0.30
27 2011 1968 158.2 +8.42 -0.10 1.193 53.4% -20 +28 -223 64.2% +1.11 12–7 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 102.1 -0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1873 150.5 +5.95 +0.23 1.134 52.5% +7 +160 -197 58.8% +0.71 13–11 (54%) 8–14 (36%) 93.9 +1.71 2022 1619 101.3 +0.44 +1.01 0.584 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14
29 2013 1904 152.1 +4.49 +1.51 1.138 52.7% +14 +46 -214 63.6% +1.01 11–9 (55%) 6–4 (60%) 99.3 +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1860 149.0 +5.95 +0.29 1.140 52.5% +6 +80 -205 59.0% +0.65 6–12 (33%) 7–6 (54%) 90.0 -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1783 141.4 +5.95 +0.02 1.201 53.3% -26 +170 -121 55.7% +0.79 10–6 (63%) 3–8 (27%) 96.9 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1702 133.6 +1.07 -2.01 0.933 48.8% -49 +307 -57 50.9% -0.12 12–4 (75%) 7–8 (47%) 102.9 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1732 137.4 +3.91 +0.24 1.115 52.4% -86 +251 — 55.6% +0.41 6–11 (35%) 6–0 (100%) 99.3 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 1655 126.0 +1.35 -4.20 0.900 48.1% -67 +228 +30 40.0% -0.64 3–4 (43%) 2–7 (22%) 93.2 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1631 116.9 -0.46 -2.06 0.900 47.9% -38 +150 +51 46.7% -0.59 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 106.9 +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1607 111.3 -1.57 -0.87 0.795 45.4% -26 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 2–0 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1518 99.9 -2.40 -3.51 0.673 42.9% -10 — +80 20.0% -2.40 0–3 (0%) — — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1506 100.9 -2.15 -2.55 0.791 45.1% +8 — — 22.2% -1.55 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2072 148.5 +4.28 -0.68 1.059 51.2% -13 +101 -98 55.2% +0.39 127–118 (52%) 95–103 (48%) 95.8 -0.97 — 1843 134.9 +1.52 -0.09 1.029 50.7% -18 +21 -39 50.3% +0.16 40–50 (44%) 29–34 (46%) 100.5 -1.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.