H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Samantha Stosur vs Rossana De Los Ríos H2H: 1-0
Samantha Stosur holds a 1–0 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Samantha Stosur leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2010 Roland Garros second round 4-6 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 4-6 6-1 6-0 | Rossana De Los Ríos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Stosur | #531 | #4 | 6,195 | 2,068 | 451 | 335 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| Rossana De Los Ríos | #1,178 | #51 | 788 | 1,616 | 62 | 119 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Stosur | Rossana De Los Ríos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #46 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #29 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #52 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #6 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #88 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 1,977 | 1 | 3 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #9 | 1,883 | 1 | 3 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,902 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,883 | 1 | 6 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #27 | 1,789 | 1 | 8 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,716 | 1 | 8 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2017 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,734 | 1 | 9 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2018 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #74 | 1,663 | 1 | 9 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #178 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2019 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #99 | 1,631 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,607 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #382 | 1,522 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #529 | 1,511 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |