H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Samantha Stosur vs Shuai Peng H2H: 8-1
Samantha Stosur holds a 8–1 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Samantha Stosur leads 5–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2018 Wimbledon first round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
8
–
1
9 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 40
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Samantha Stosur | 6-4 7-5 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
| May 26, 2017* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 7-6(0) 6-4 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2017* | Taipei | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Shuai Peng | 6-4 6-4 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| May 16, 2013* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 7-6(5) 6-0 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2013* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2012* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-2 6-2 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2010* | Charleston | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-4 6-1 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
| May 13, 2006* | Prague | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-1 6-3 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Stosur | #531 | #4 | 6,195 | 2,068 | 451 | 335 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| Shuai Peng | #820 | #14 | 2,825 | 1,890 | 300 | 258 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Stosur | Shuai Peng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #518 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #80 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #55 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #46 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #29 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #46 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #52 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #72 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #17 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #6 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #40 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 1,977 | 1 | 3 | 2013 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #9 | 1,883 | 1 | 3 | 2014 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #21 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,902 | 1 | 5 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #137 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,883 | 1 | 6 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #84 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2015 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #27 | 1,789 | 1 | 8 | 2017 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #27 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2016 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,716 | 1 | 8 | 2018 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #125 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2017 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,734 | 1 | 9 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #109 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2018 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #74 | 1,663 | 1 | 9 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2019 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #99 | 1,631 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,607 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #382 | 1,522 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #529 | 1,511 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |