H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-7

Venus Williams holds a 7–1 lead over Samantha Stosur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 4–1 on clay and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2015 Miami third round 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Samantha Stosur
AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 7
8 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 26, 2015* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #16 6-4 7-6(3) Samantha Stosur #26 Match data
Aug 18, 2012* Cincinnati WTA 1000 QF Hard Venus Williams #64 6-2 6-7(2) 6-4 Samantha Stosur #6 Match data
May 18, 2012* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Venus Williams #63 6-4 6-3 Samantha Stosur #5 Match data
Apr 7, 2012* Charleston WTA 500 QF Clay Samantha Stosur #5 6-3 4-6 6-3 Venus Williams #87 Match data
May 15, 2010* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Venus Williams #3 6-3 6-3 Samantha Stosur #8 Match data
Aug 27, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Venus Williams #8 6-2 6-3 Samantha Stosur #72 Match data
May 15, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Venus Williams #9 6-4 6-1 Samantha Stosur #145 Match data
Apr 11, 2007* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Venus Williams #29 6-2 6-2 Samantha Stosur #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47