H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sandrine Testud vs Iva Majoli H2H: 5-3 (incl. walkovers)

Sandrine Testud vs Iva Majoli: 5–2 excluding walkovers; 5–3 including 1 walkover. Across 8 main-draw results including walkovers, Sandrine Testud leads 5–0 on hard courts, while Iva Majoli leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 2002 Charleston Open semifinal 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H including walkovers
5 – 3
8 main-draw results
Iva Majoli
CRO Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Iva Majoli #58 6-2 6-4 Sandrine Testud #11 Match data Apr 20, 2002* SF Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Sandrine Testud #14 7-6(6) 6-4 Iva Majoli #40 Match data Oct 19, 2001* R16 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Sandrine Testud #17 6-1 6-1 Iva Majoli #72 Match data Jul 29, 1999* R32 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Sandrine Testud #14 6-7 6-4 6-1 Iva Majoli #19 Match data Aug 20, 1998* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Sandrine Testud #17 6-4 2-6 6-1 Iva Majoli #4 Match data Aug 28, 1997* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Sandrine Testud #18 7-5 6-3 Iva Majoli #4 Match data Aug 23, 1997* SF Atlanta Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Iva Majoli #4 4-6 7-5 6-4 Sandrine Testud #39 Match data Jun 2, 1996* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Iva Majoli #4 (w/o) Sandrine Testud #37 Match data Feb 17, 1996* R16 Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,003 309 237 56.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Iva Majoli #777 #4 3,406 2,155 262 192 57.7% 1 3 0 4 0 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sandrine Testud Iva Majoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1992 7–6 53.8% #50 1,624 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1993 13–13 50.0% #46 1,735 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1994 38–19 66.7% #13 1,921 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 29–12 70.7% #9 2,045 0 2
18 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0 1996 42–17 71.2% #7 2,038 0 4
19 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,549 0 0 1997 43–21 67.2% #6 1,946 1 7
20 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,568 0 0 1998 23–20 53.5% #25 1,828 1 7
21 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,561 0 0 1999 5–11 31.2% #164 1,694 1 7
22 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0 2000 11–11 50.0% #62 1,695 1 7
23 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0 2001 20–22 47.6% #44 1,697 1 7
24 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,774 0 0 2002 23–22 51.1% #32 1,667 1 8
25 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,920 0 1 2003 7–15 31.8% #131 1,606 1 8
26 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,945 0 2 2004 1–3 25.0% #321 1,579 1 8
27 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,917 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,977 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,846 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 1–8 11.1% #313 1,725 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sandrine Testud Iva Majoli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 16 7 23 69.6% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 14 3 17 82.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
18 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 10 6 16 62.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 4 19 78.9%
19 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 8 9 17 47.1% 19 4 23 82.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
20 1992 7 9 16 43.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 6 5 11 54.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1994 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 5 5 10 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 1996 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1997 20 10 30 66.7% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2003 0 6 6 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1999 20 12 32 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 39 17 56 69.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 183 118 301 60.8% 78 66 144 54.2% 19 21 40 47.5% 29 32 61 47.5% — 85 81 166 51.2% 105 58 163 64.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 61 43 104 58.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sandrine Testud Iva Majoli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1624 131.4 — — — — -1 -35 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -0.26
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1736 154.2 — — — — -24 -82 — 51.7% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.6 -0.69
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1922 155.6 — — — — -47 -71 -318 58.8% +0.37 18–6 (75%) 10–2 (83%) 116.4 -1.10
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2046 165.8 — — — — 0 -128 — 66.7% +1.21 8–6 (57%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 -0.04
18 1990 1484 99.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.16 1996 2038 166.9 — — — — +33 -42 -404 65.7% +0.63 13–8 (62%) 11–4 (73%) 105.7 -1.43
19 1991 1550 115.1 — — — — +5 -2 — 47.6% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.2 +0.80 1997 1946 159.5 — — — — -16 +184 -241 60.5% +0.66 20–9 (69%) 10–9 (53%) 106.3 +1.31
20 1992 1568 120.4 — — — — +2 -13 -14 42.2% -0.63 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.5 +0.18 1998 1829 148.6 — — — — -4 +251 — 52.7% 0.00 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 99.1 -0.16
21 1993 1561 126.2 — — — — +20 -9 — 39.7% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.5 -1.09 1999 1694 121.9 — — — — +5 +287 — 35.1% -1.08 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.20
22 1994 1605 130.9 — — — — +19 -44 — 45.3% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +0.24 2000 1695 114.9 — — — — -4 +192 — 42.3% -0.77 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.6 -0.36
23 1995 1737 138.2 — — — — +1 -140 — 55.1% +0.24 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 99.9 -0.86 2001 1697 138.2 — — — — +23 +107 — 49.5% -0.19 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 -0.47
24 1996 1774 140.4 — — — — -7 -110 -241 54.7% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 104.9 +1.01 2002 1668 129.8 — — — — -45 +156 +61 51.9% -0.21 8–10 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 95.6 +0.77
25 1997 1921 159.0 — — — — -23 -105 -290 60.1% +0.67 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) 108.5 -0.03 2003 1607 113.3 -3.85 -1.53 0.641 40.0% -55 +133 — 35.3% -1.04 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 96.9 -0.94
26 1998 1945 158.8 — — — — -9 -36 -184 63.6% +1.08 19–10 (66%) 10–10 (50%) 106.1 +1.78 2004 1579 102.6 — — — — -48 — — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 — — -0.23
27 1999 1901 157.5 — — — — +27 -33 -217 56.7% +0.48 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 +2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 1918 163.3 — — — — +69 -103 -240 56.6% +0.65 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1978 158.2 — — — — +16 -130 -244 62.3% +0.97 14–9 (61%) 10–13 (43%) 100.0 -3.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1846 144.7 — — — — +107 +12 -165 52.0% +0.39 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1726 120.4 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +166 +41 — 26.3% -1.58 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2004 155.8 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +17 -60 -202 55.2% +0.45 98–79 (55%) 64–61 (51%) 103.8 -0.18 — 2155 156.1 -3.85 -1.53 0.641 40.0% -9 +79 -234 55.0% +0.17 99–66 (60%) 62–43 (59%) 109.1 -0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.