H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sania Mirza vs Anna Chakvetadze H2H: 0-4
Anna Chakvetadze holds a 4–0 lead over Sania Mirza in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anna Chakvetadze leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2007 US Open third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2007* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-2 6-3 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2007* | Stanford | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-3 6-2 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2007* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2007* | Hobart | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-4 6-1 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Anna Chakvetadze | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 |