H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sania Mirza vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 2-0
Sania Mirza holds a 2–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sania Mirza leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2009 Wimbledon first round 6-2 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2009* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Sania Mirza | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2005* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-4 6-3 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sania Mirza | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |