H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sania Mirza vs Ekaterina Bychkova H2H: 0-2
Ekaterina Bychkova holds a 2–0 lead over Sania Mirza in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ekaterina Bychkova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Bychkova won the 2010 Tashkent third round 6-1 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2010* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ekaterina Bychkova | 6-1 4-6 7-5 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2005* | Bali | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Ekaterina Bychkova | 6-3 6-2 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ekaterina Bychkova | #814 | #66 | 588 | 1,584 | 34 | 67 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Ekaterina Bychkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #70 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #76 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #111 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #117 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #181 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |