H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sania Mirza vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 2-1
Sania Mirza holds a 2–1 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sania Mirza leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Eleni Daniilidou won the 2012 Kuala Lumpur third round 6-2 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2012* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Eleni Daniilidou | 6-2 1-6 6-4 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2007* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 7-6(1) 6-3 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2005* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Eleni Daniilidou | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 |