H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Sania Mirza holds a 1–0 lead over Ipek Senoglu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sania Mirza leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2006 Istanbul round of 32 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | 6-3 6-1 | Ipek Senoglu | Match data | May 25, 2006* | R32 | Istanbul | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,829 | 121 | 118 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ipek Senoglu | #934 | #293 | 82 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Ipek Senoglu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #101 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #574 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #537 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #763 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #934 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Ipek Senoglu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2003 | 1485 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 1469 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.50 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 1677 | 132.3 | -0.65 | +0.44 | 0.986 | 49.9% | +8 | — | -86 | 59.0% | +0.67 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–2 (80%) | 110.0 | +1.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 1651 | 128.5 | -2.06 | +2.06 | 1.005 | 49.9% | +10 | -157 | -66 | 48.6% | +0.16 | 6–13 (32%) | 3–10 (23%) | 90.1 | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 1756 | 136.9 | +0.06 | +1.75 | 1.062 | 51.2% | +19 | -286 | -178 | 57.5% | +0.63 | 10–5 (67%) | 6–4 (60%) | 104.9 | +0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 1647 | 120.3 | +0.03 | -1.09 | 0.968 | 49.5% | +46 | — | -92 | 52.0% | +0.10 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.5 | +1.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 1719 | 122.5 | -1.13 | +1.12 | 1.002 | 50.0% | +12 | -244 | -77 | 52.9% | +0.09 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–3 (57%) | 104.0 | -0.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 1604 | 110.7 | -1.99 | +0.10 | 0.968 | 49.2% | +28 | — | +17 | 40.5% | -0.51 | 2–5 (29%) | — | — | +0.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 1557 | 117.8 | -3.49 | +1.90 | 0.937 | 48.6% | +17 | -32 | — | 39.6% | -0.96 | 2–7 (22%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.3 | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 1541 | 99.8 | -2.53 | -1.83 | 0.925 | 48.3% | +11 | — | — | 36.8% | -0.58 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1489 | 94.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1478 | 96.6 | -4.44 | -2.71 | 0.645 | 43.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.07 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1469 | 97.0 | -1.56 | -4.02 | 0.731 | 42.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.11 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1455 | 94.7 | -1.86 | -5.08 | 0.496 | 32.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.12 |
| Career | — | 1829 | 130.7 | -1.28 | +0.98 | 0.995 | 49.9% | +17 | -150 | -87 | 51.1% | +0.13 | 43–47 (48%) | 24–25 (49%) | 98.5 | +1.30 | — | 1500 | 92.2 | -2.62 | -3.94 | 0.609 | 39.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | -3.75 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 3, 2009 | H2H |
| Shahar Peer | 4 | 1 | 5 | Aug 31, 2011 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 25, 2011 | H2H |
| Francesca Schiavone | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 7, 2010 | H2H |
| Alona Bondarenko | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 9, 2009 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Elena Camerin | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 30, 2009 | H2H |
| Olga Govortsova | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 22, 2008 | H2H |
| Vania King | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 24, 2007 | H2H |
| Sania Mirza | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 25, 2006 | H2H |