H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sania Mirza vs Tatiana Golovin H2H: 1-2
Tatiana Golovin holds a 2–1 lead over Sania Mirza in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tatiana Golovin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2007 Stanford fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2007* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-4 6-1 | Tatiana Golovin | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2006* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Tatiana Golovin | 6-4 6-2 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2005* | Japan Open | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Tatiana Golovin | 6-2 6-4 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tatiana Golovin | #1,128 | #12 | 1,882 | 2,012 | 131 | 80 | 62.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Tatiana Golovin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #358 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #13 | 1,981 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #254 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |