H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sara Errani vs Aleksandra Wozniak H2H: 1-2

Aleksandra Wozniak holds a 2–1 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Aleksandra Wozniak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2016 Canadian Open first round 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Aleksandra Wozniak
Canada Age 39 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sara Errani #25 6-4 7-6(4) Aleksandra Wozniak #465 Match data Jul 27, 2016* R64 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Aleksandra Wozniak #31 6-1 0-0 (ret.) Sara Errani #49 Match data Oct 22, 2009* R32 Moscow Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Aleksandra Wozniak #26 6-1 3-6 6-4 Sara Errani #36 Match data May 5, 2009* R64 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Errani #476 #5 5,835 2,005 387 304 56.0% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Aleksandra Wozniak #1,042 #21 2,114 1,793 103 129 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Aleksandra Wozniak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #492 1,490 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2005 0–3 0.0% #168 1,458 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2006 3–5 37.5% #93 1,467 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2007 8–16 33.3% #136 1,477 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,613 0 0 2008 19–15 55.9% #34 1,677 0 1
21 2008 29–22 56.9% #42 1,735 0 2 2009 30–25 54.5% #34 1,767 0 1
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,655 0 2 2010 11–18 37.9% #125 1,602 0 1
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,722 0 2 2011 4–7 36.4% #107 1,582 0 1
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,673 0 2 2012 19–17 52.8% #43 1,718 0 1
25 2012 53–20 72.6% #6 1,897 0 6 2013 2–7 22.2% #288 1,652 0 1
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,885 0 7 2014 7–10 41.2% #130 1,618 0 1
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,751 0 8 2016 0–4 0.0% #301 1,533 0 1
29 2016 21–23 47.7% #49 1,656 0 9 2017 0–1 0.0% #300 1,506 0 1
30 2017 18–16 52.9% #144 1,652 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,767 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2019 2–6 25.0% #198 1,575 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–12 40.0% #121 1,574 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–5 28.6% #109 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–14 41.7% #105 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #476 1,590 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Errani Aleksandra Wozniak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 4 12 16 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 2007 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 16 10 26 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2008 14 10 24 58.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 16 15 31 51.6% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
22 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 3 9 12 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2010 21 16 37 56.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2011 14 16 30 46.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 10 9 19 52.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 23 14 37 62.2% 28 3 31 90.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2013 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2014 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 4 6 10 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 160 338 52.7% 188 115 303 62.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — 62 85 147 42.2% 29 29 58 50.0% 12 15 27 44.4% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 593/692 of Sara Errani's and 193/228 of Aleksandra Wozniak's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sara Errani Aleksandra Wozniak
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 4.0 5.0 64.0% 56.3% 33.3% 40.0% 25.0% 48.0% 42.7%
19 2006 1/6 0.0 1.0 76.4% 33.3% 38.5% 50.0% 16.7% 34.5% 39.5% 2007 13/24 2.1 4.5 53.3% 60.8% 39.2% 52.6% 41.4% 50.7% 40.7%
20 2007 12/17 0.8 2.3 66.1% 56.1% 48.0% 41.1% 52.6% 53.4% 44.4% 2008 28/34 2.3 4.0 61.3% 62.9% 43.8% 55.7% 49.5% 55.7% 43.1%
21 2008 34/51 0.5 2.7 64.2% 57.6% 46.0% 48.1% 45.8% 53.2% 45.7% 2009 52/55 2.5 3.8 59.7% 63.7% 48.1% 51.3% 55.3% 57.4% 46.2%
22 2009 44/52 0.3 2.5 69.2% 55.6% 44.7% 50.9% 45.1% 52.5% 44.6% 2010 28/29 2.0 3.5 65.3% 59.1% 40.1% 52.1% 44.8% 52.6% 41.5%
23 2010 59/65 0.4 1.5 75.4% 56.2% 44.0% 55.5% 51.2% 53.4% 47.7% 2011 11/11 1.9 2.9 66.2% 65.9% 46.5% 59.1% 38.8% 59.5% 45.3%
24 2011 53/56 0.4 1.9 76.2% 57.7% 47.2% 52.0% 48.6% 55.0% 47.1% 2012 32/36 2.4 3.8 62.5% 63.4% 45.3% 51.3% 51.2% 56.5% 46.3%
25 2012 63/73 0.3 1.1 76.1% 60.2% 49.9% 54.1% 56.5% 57.5% 51.5% 2013 8/9 1.3 6.8 59.5% 54.2% 37.3% 50.4% 55.7% 47.4% 44.3%
26 2013 57/68 0.1 1.1 82.1% 57.9% 48.5% 52.4% 51.1% 56.1% 50.4% 2014 16/17 2.2 4.3 57.2% 62.5% 40.9% 50.7% 45.1% 53.1% 45.2%
27 2014 54/58 0.1 1.2 81.3% 56.1% 45.3% 52.4% 50.1% 54.1% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 54/72 0.1 1.4 83.3% 54.9% 50.0% 49.2% 55.4% 54.2% 49.7% 2016 3/4 0.7 7.0 69.1% 49.9% 33.5% 52.2% 41.7% 44.8% 40.0%
29 2016 38/45 0.1 1.2 85.4% 52.9% 43.6% 51.6% 52.4% 51.5% 48.0% 2017 1/1 1.0 5.0 59.7% 53.5% 44.8% 40.0% 60.0% 50.0% 34.5%
30 2017 31/34 0.1 1.3 78.7% 52.5% 41.2% 40.6% 54.1% 50.3% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 14/14 0.1 2.9 81.3% 57.5% 36.7% 41.9% 45.6% 53.8% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 8/8 0.1 8.0 61.0% 51.0% 28.4% 30.1% 44.3% 42.3% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 7/7 0.0 4.6 77.6% 54.9% 39.2% 58.2% 57.5% 51.3% 51.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 19/20 0.1 2.9 78.4% 52.1% 36.1% 52.3% 55.8% 48.5% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 7/7 0.0 1.9 80.7% 52.1% 33.4% 39.3% 47.1% 48.4% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 13/13 0.0 1.5 79.1% 47.8% 31.7% 36.6% 49.8% 44.5% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 23/24 0.1 1.5 77.5% 52.4% 42.3% 41.1% 47.1% 49.8% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2/2 0.0 1.5 82.0% 53.3% 47.6% 49.5% 75.0% 52.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 593/692 0.2 1.7 77.3% 55.8% 44.9% 49.9% 51.1% 53.3% 47.9% — 193/232 2.2 4.0 61.1% 62.0% 43.8% 52.4% 49.2% 54.9% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Errani Aleksandra Wozniak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1491 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.03
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1459 102.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 0–2 — 0.00
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1468 109.8 -1.51 -0.76 0.821 45.3% +29 — — 44.4% +0.11 0–2 — — +0.28
19 2006 1529 107.3 -2.72 -1.03 0.604 36.7% — +41 — 46.2% -0.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.21 2007 1478 107.0 -3.54 -2.63 0.826 45.9% -1 +74 — 28.6% -1.41 3–2 (60%) 0–6 (0%) 97.3 +0.24
20 2007 1614 121.3 -0.77 +0.04 0.953 49.0% -56 +20 — 55.0% +0.43 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -0.20 2008 1678 129.2 +0.51 -0.06 0.972 49.4% -2 -141 — 50.7% -0.11 7–2 (78%) 0–4 (0%) 104.2 +0.05
21 2008 1735 135.4 -1.78 +1.64 0.976 49.4% -49 -6 -147 53.8% +0.34 10–7 (59%) 4–5 (44%) 102.2 -1.64 2009 1767 133.0 +1.75 +2.32 1.085 51.8% -39 -118 -131 52.4% +0.22 10–10 (50%) 11–5 (69%) 104.9 -0.33
22 2009 1655 132.5 -2.62 +1.07 0.938 48.6% +1 +49 -81 50.9% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 6–3 (67%) 100.5 +0.75 2010 1602 108.4 -2.85 -1.60 0.875 47.2% -5 +46 +21 37.7% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.7 +0.69
23 2010 1723 134.3 -2.26 +3.11 1.025 50.6% +16 -53 -104 56.5% +0.29 6–11 (35%) 12–6 (67%) 100.8 +1.24 2011 1582 124.8 +1.18 +1.26 1.118 52.3% +3 — — 41.7% +0.29 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.06
24 2011 1673 134.0 -0.30 +3.09 1.047 51.0% -6 +66 -54 54.0% +0.26 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.90 2012 1719 135.4 +0.10 +1.88 1.064 51.3% -42 -27 -81 54.8% +0.39 6–8 (43%) 8–4 (67%) 104.6 -0.14
25 2012 1898 155.0 +1.80 +6.73 1.210 54.4% -78 +149 -273 69.0% +1.52 11–5 (69%) 7–3 (70%) 107.8 -1.43 2013 1652 121.8 -3.37 +0.90 0.842 46.2% -33 — — 25.0% -1.45 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.66
26 2013 1886 156.0 +1.16 +6.37 1.149 53.2% -27 +186 — 62.2% +0.85 10–5 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.2 -0.44 2014 1619 118.6 -2.20 +0.51 0.965 48.9% -3 — +19 40.5% -0.69 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 -0.26
27 2014 1774 140.1 -1.37 +3.74 1.048 51.1% -49 +280 — 58.0% +0.40 9–10 (47%) 10–6 (63%) 95.0 +2.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 1752 137.5 -3.26 +7.03 1.083 52.0% -25 +216 -179 58.6% +0.66 18–11 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 104.0 +3.08 2016 1533 94.9 -2.12 -2.18 0.725 42.5% +3 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.39
29 2016 1657 128.4 -3.45 +3.74 0.989 49.8% +7 +192 -112 49.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 94.9 +0.33 2017 1507 92.2 -3.22 -0.52 0.690 43.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.07
30 2017 1652 117.1 -4.83 +3.87 0.998 49.9% +19 +108 — 53.3% +0.13 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1767 125.7 -0.84 +2.69 0.996 50.0% +17 -5 — 48.5% -0.21 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 1575 92.5 -7.16 -0.74 0.798 44.2% — +37 — 31.6% -1.74 1–2 (33%) — — +0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1607 122.5 -2.17 +3.15 1.053 51.1% — +33 — 55.6% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1575 114.0 -4.44 +2.94 0.966 49.1% -11 +76 — 39.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1607 109.2 -3.27 +0.30 0.881 46.5% — +45 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1548 97.8 -6.59 -1.63 0.755 43.4% -51 +75 -7 24.1% -2.07 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1693 123.6 -4.63 +1.30 0.884 47.1% -121 +82 — 37.7% -0.94 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 106.5 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1590 105.5 -0.55 +0.36 0.771 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 138.5 -1.81 +3.71 1.026 50.6% -25 +106 -122 54.6% +0.29 105–95 (53%) 85–59 (59%) 104.5 -0.06 — 1793 127.8 -0.40 +0.63 0.983 49.6% -16 -41 -56 44.2% -0.35 34–36 (49%) 27–29 (48%) 102.3 +0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.