H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 3-3

Sara Errani and Andrea Petkovic are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Andrea Petkovic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2016 Eastbourne third round 6-1 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Andrea Petkovic
GER Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 23, 2016* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Andrea Petkovic #34 6-1 3-6 6-4 Sara Errani #22 Match data
Oct 9, 2015* Beijing WTA 1000 R16 Hard Sara Errani #20 3-6 6-3 6-2 Andrea Petkovic #21 Match data
May 30, 2015* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Sara Errani #17 6-3 6-3 Andrea Petkovic #10 Match data
Jun 5, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Andrea Petkovic #27 6-2 6-2 Sara Errani #11 Match data
May 7, 2014* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Sara Errani #11 7-5 6-1 Andrea Petkovic #29 Match data
May 12, 2010* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Andrea Petkovic #51 6-7(3) 6-1 7-5 Sara Errani #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,990 273 225 54.8% 0 0 1 3 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Andrea Petkovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,613 0 1
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,796 0 1
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,975 0 2
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,857 0 2
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,798 0 2
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,826 0 5
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,685 0 6
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2016 19–19 50.0% #55 1,702 0 6
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2017 9–20 31.0% #99 1,631 0 6
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2018 13–13 50.0% #64 1,700 0 6
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,712 0 6
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,697 0 6
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,730 0 7
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,707 0 7
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —