H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sara Errani vs Angelique Kerber H2H: 2-2
Sara Errani and Angelique Kerber are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Angelique Kerber leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Sara Errani leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Angelique Kerber won the 2018 Dubai fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2018* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-4 6-2 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Sara Errani | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
| Jun 6, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Sara Errani | 6-3 7-6(2) | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2012* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-1 6-2 | Sara Errani | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Errani | #461 | #5 | 5,835 | 2,024 | 384 | 299 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,045 | 461 | 270 | 63.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Errani | Angelique Kerber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #42 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #47 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #45 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2012 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2013 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #7 | 1,894 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2014 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #14 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2015 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #20 | 1,752 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 54–16 | 77.1% | #1 | 2,024 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,625 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,767 | 2 | 10 |
| 30 | 2017 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #144 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #2 | 1,924 | 3 | 12 |
| 31 | 2018 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #112 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,800 | 3 | 12 |
| 32 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #198 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,764 | 3 | 12 |
| 33 | 2020 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 9 | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,933 | 3 | 13 |
| 34 | 2021 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 9 | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,878 | 3 | 14 |
| 35 | 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,597 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #105 | 1,550 | 0 | 9 | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #205 | 1,788 | 3 | 14 |
| 37 | 2024 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,594 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |