H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Christina Mchale H2H: 4-3

Sara Errani holds a 4–3 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Christina Mchale won the 2021 Charleston 2 third round 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Christina Mchale
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 15, 2021* Charleston 2 WTA 250 R32 Clay Christina Mchale #91 7-6(3) 6-3 Sara Errani #112 Match data
Oct 14, 2017* Tianjin WTA 250 QF Hard Sara Errani #280 5-7 7-6(2) 6-1 Christina Mchale #65 Match data
Jan 1, 2017 Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Hard Christina Mchale #45 6-3 6-3 Sara Errani #49 Match data
May 14, 2015* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Christina Mchale #65 6-4 6-4 Sara Errani #15 Match data
May 16, 2013* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Sara Errani #6 7-5 5-7 6-2 Christina Mchale #54 Match data
Jun 9, 2011* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Sara Errani #35 7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 Christina Mchale #71 Match data
May 24, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Sara Errani #39 6-7(4) 6-2 9-7 Christina Mchale #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Christina Mchale #319 #24 1,935 1,803 166 207 44.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Christina Mchale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2009 1–2 33.3% #231 1,499 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2010 8–9 47.1% #109 1,556 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2011 19–17 52.8% #43 1,716 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2012 21–20 51.2% #33 1,676 0 0
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2013 13–18 41.9% #66 1,636 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2014 20–21 48.8% #52 1,647 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2015 18–21 46.2% #63 1,635 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2016 24–21 53.3% #45 1,698 0 1
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2017 19–26 42.2% #64 1,690 0 1
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2018 8–17 32.0% #151 1,568 0 1
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2019 7–10 41.2% #88 1,652 0 1
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2020 6–8 42.9% #81 1,675 0 1
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2021 2–16 11.1% #159 1,524 0 1
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2022 0–1 0.0% #319 1,452 0 1
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —