H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sara Errani vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 5-6
Daniela Hantuchova holds a 6–5 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, they are tied 4–4 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2015 Rome second round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5
–
6
11 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 43
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2015* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sara Errani | 6-4 7-6(4) | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2015* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-3 6-2 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2013* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sara Errani | 6-3 6-1 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2013* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Sara Errani | 7-5 5-7 6-2 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| Jan 4, 2013* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 4-6 6-1 7-5 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2012* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Sara Errani | 6-4 6-4 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| May 25, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-1 6-2 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2011* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-0 6-2 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2009* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2009* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sara Errani | 6-7(1) 6-4 6-0 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Daniela Hantuchova | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Sara Errani | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Errani | #461 | #5 | 5,835 | 2,024 | 384 | 299 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 457 | 361 | 55.9% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Errani | Daniela Hantuchova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #42 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #47 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #45 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2012 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #21 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2013 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #7 | 1,894 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2014 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #14 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2015 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #20 | 1,752 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,625 | 0 | 9 | 2012 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2017 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #144 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2018 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #112 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,577 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #198 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,574 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 2020 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 9 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2021 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,524 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,597 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #105 | 1,550 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,594 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |