H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 2-5

Dominika Cibulkova holds a 5–2 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Sara Errani leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2013 Sydney quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 12, 2013* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Dominika Cibulkova #15 6-2 6-1 Sara Errani #7 Match data
Apr 15, 2012* Barcelona WTA 250 F Clay Sara Errani #33 6-2 6-2 Dominika Cibulkova #17 Match data
Oct 14, 2011* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #23 6-7(1) 6-3 6-1 Sara Errani #47 Match data
Jan 6, 2011* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #31 6-3 6-0 Sara Errani #43 Match data
Mar 10, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sara Errani #49 7-5 6-4 Dominika Cibulkova #29 Match data
Mar 5, 2010* Monterrey WTA 500 R16 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #29 3-6 6-4 6-1 Sara Errani #49 Match data
Aug 19, 2009* Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #15 6-4 6-2 Sara Errani #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,966 365 261 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Dominika Cibulkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2008 34–25 57.6% #19 1,840 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,733 0 0
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,893 0 1
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2012 34–25 57.6% #15 1,810 0 2
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,738 0 3
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,865 0 8
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,764 0 8
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —