H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 3-4

Ekaterina Makarova holds a 4–3 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Ekaterina Makarova leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Sara Errani leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2017 Australian Open second round 6-2 3-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Ekaterina Makarova
RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 2017* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #34 6-2 3-2 (ret.) Sara Errani #53 Match data
Aug 24, 2016* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #36 7-5 6-2 Sara Errani #29 Match data
May 15, 2014* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Sara Errani #11 6-2 6-3 Ekaterina Makarova #24 Match data
Mar 20, 2014* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #24 6-3 2-6 6-4 Sara Errani #10 Match data
Aug 23, 2013* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #26 7-5 6-1 Sara Errani #5 Match data
May 11, 2013* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Sara Errani #7 6-4 6-3 Ekaterina Makarova #24 Match data
Jan 21, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Sara Errani #46 6-2 6-3 Ekaterina Makarova #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,940 248 222 52.8% 0 0 0 2 1 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Ekaterina Makarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,662 0 1
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,604 0 1
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,838 0 1
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,837 0 2
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,784 0 2
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2016 23–18 56.1% #30 1,782 0 2
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,836 0 3
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,750 0 3
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,700 0 3
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —