H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sara Errani vs Melinda Czink H2H: 1-0

Sara Errani holds a 1–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Errani leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2012 Budapest round of 16 6-4 1-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Melinda Czink
HUN Age 43 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sara Errani #27 6-4 1-6 6-1 Melinda Czink #118 Match data May 4, 2012* R16 Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Errani #476 #5 5,835 2,005 387 304 56.0% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Melinda Czink #691 #37 1,571 1,796 89 137 39.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Melinda Czink
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,613 0 0 2003 4–3 57.1% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2008 29–22 56.9% #42 1,735 0 2 2004 2–16 11.1% #128 1,427 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,655 0 2 2005 9–12 42.9% #96 1,478 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,722 0 2 2006 14–18 43.8% #105 1,500 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,673 0 2 2007 3–9 25.0% #124 1,456 0 0
25 2012 53–20 72.6% #6 1,897 0 6 2008 10–11 47.6% #106 1,558 0 0
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,885 0 7 2009 29–21 58.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2010 3–16 15.8% #312 1,533 0 1
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,751 0 8 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,525 0 1
29 2016 21–23 47.7% #49 1,656 0 9 2012 9–16 36.0% #94 1,543 0 1
30 2017 18–16 52.9% #144 1,652 0 9 2013 3–9 25.0% #254 1,500 0 1
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,767 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2019 2–6 25.0% #198 1,575 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–12 40.0% #121 1,574 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–5 28.6% #109 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–14 41.7% #105 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #476 1,590 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Errani Melinda Czink
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2006 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 14 10 24 58.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2010 21 16 37 56.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2011 14 16 30 46.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2012 23 14 37 62.2% 28 3 31 90.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 3 9 12 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
30 2017 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 4 6 10 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 160 338 52.7% 188 115 303 62.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — 56 77 133 42.1% 22 44 66 33.3% 11 16 27 40.7% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 593/692 of Sara Errani's and 143/226 of Melinda Czink's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sara Errani Melinda Czink
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2006 1/6 0.0 1.0 76.4% 33.3% 38.5% 50.0% 16.7% 34.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 12/17 0.8 2.3 66.1% 56.1% 48.0% 41.1% 52.6% 53.4% 44.4% 2003 3/7 1.0 1.7 65.3% 58.7% 40.7% 45.8% 31.9% 52.1% 41.9%
21 2008 34/51 0.5 2.7 64.2% 57.6% 46.0% 48.1% 45.8% 53.2% 45.7% 2004 4/18 1.0 2.0 70.2% 54.4% 42.8% 39.0% 56.8% 50.8% 44.0%
22 2009 44/52 0.3 2.5 69.2% 55.6% 44.7% 50.9% 45.1% 52.5% 44.6% 2005 1/21 1.0 4.0 71.4% 54.3% 28.6% 50.0% 100.0% 46.9% 29.6%
23 2010 59/65 0.4 1.5 75.4% 56.2% 44.0% 55.5% 51.2% 53.4% 47.7% 2006 6/32 2.0 3.3 71.5% 59.4% 46.2% 60.2% 50.6% 55.2% 42.5%
24 2011 53/56 0.4 1.9 76.2% 57.7% 47.2% 52.0% 48.6% 55.0% 47.1% 2007 4/12 1.0 4.5 62.6% 62.1% 45.1% 40.4% 36.1% 55.8% 36.3%
25 2012 63/73 0.3 1.1 76.1% 60.2% 49.9% 54.1% 56.5% 57.5% 51.5% 2008 16/21 2.8 5.2 62.8% 66.0% 42.4% 50.4% 55.5% 57.1% 39.5%
26 2013 57/68 0.1 1.1 82.1% 57.9% 48.5% 52.4% 51.1% 56.1% 50.4% 2009 44/50 3.5 5.5 61.7% 64.9% 47.8% 49.9% 51.8% 58.1% 42.7%
27 2014 54/58 0.1 1.2 81.3% 56.1% 45.3% 52.4% 50.1% 54.1% 48.1% 2010 19/19 2.8 6.3 61.0% 61.3% 39.9% 46.1% 28.6% 52.9% 38.0%
28 2015 54/72 0.1 1.4 83.3% 54.9% 50.0% 49.2% 55.4% 54.2% 49.7% 2011 9/9 2.3 6.8 61.8% 61.7% 47.4% 43.6% 45.3% 56.0% 40.8%
29 2016 38/45 0.1 1.2 85.4% 52.9% 43.6% 51.6% 52.4% 51.5% 48.0% 2012 25/25 2.7 4.2 59.6% 64.5% 48.9% 53.6% 46.3% 58.1% 39.5%
30 2017 31/34 0.1 1.3 78.7% 52.5% 41.2% 40.6% 54.1% 50.3% 49.6% 2013 12/12 3.3 4.7 62.4% 63.3% 40.1% 50.6% 43.7% 54.8% 36.9%
31 2018 14/14 0.1 2.9 81.3% 57.5% 36.7% 41.9% 45.6% 53.8% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 8/8 0.1 8.0 61.0% 51.0% 28.4% 30.1% 44.3% 42.3% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 7/7 0.0 4.6 77.6% 54.9% 39.2% 58.2% 57.5% 51.3% 51.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 19/20 0.1 2.9 78.4% 52.1% 36.1% 52.3% 55.8% 48.5% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 7/7 0.0 1.9 80.7% 52.1% 33.4% 39.3% 47.1% 48.4% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 13/13 0.0 1.5 79.1% 47.8% 31.7% 36.6% 49.8% 44.5% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 23/24 0.1 1.5 77.5% 52.4% 42.3% 41.1% 47.1% 49.8% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2/2 0.0 1.5 82.0% 53.3% 47.6% 49.5% 75.0% 52.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 593/692 0.2 1.7 77.3% 55.8% 44.9% 49.9% 51.1% 53.3% 47.9% — 143/226 2.8 5.0 62.2% 63.3% 45.1% 49.5% 46.6% 56.3% 40.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Errani Melinda Czink
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2006 1529 107.3 -2.72 -1.03 0.604 36.7% — +41 — 46.2% -0.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1614 121.3 -0.77 +0.04 0.953 49.0% -56 +20 — 55.0% +0.43 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -0.20 2003 1568 119.7 -0.23 +0.05 0.875 46.6% +6 -6 — 44.4% -0.50 4–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.33
21 2008 1735 135.4 -1.78 +1.64 0.976 49.4% -49 -6 -147 53.8% +0.34 10–7 (59%) 4–5 (44%) 102.2 -1.64 2004 1428 98.7 -0.95 -0.17 0.894 47.4% +79 +17 — 21.4% -2.07 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.23
22 2009 1655 132.5 -2.62 +1.07 0.938 48.6% +1 +49 -81 50.9% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 6–3 (67%) 100.5 +0.75 2005 1478 105.8 -1.18 -2.27 0.558 37.9% +88 -105 — 41.7% -0.67 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.54
23 2010 1723 134.3 -2.26 +3.11 1.025 50.6% +16 -53 -104 56.5% +0.29 6–11 (35%) 12–6 (67%) 100.8 +1.24 2006 1501 112.0 -1.09 -1.39 0.950 49.1% +30 -48 +15 45.9% -0.36 6–6 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 +1.02
24 2011 1673 134.0 -0.30 +3.09 1.047 51.0% -6 +66 -54 54.0% +0.26 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.90 2007 1457 101.5 -0.83 -2.90 0.821 45.7% +57 -51 — 31.0% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.11
25 2012 1898 155.0 +1.80 +6.73 1.210 54.4% -78 +149 -273 69.0% +1.52 11–5 (69%) 7–3 (70%) 107.8 -1.43 2008 1559 122.7 +0.81 -3.19 0.920 48.5% +7 -110 -18 47.9% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 +0.10
26 2013 1886 156.0 +1.16 +6.37 1.149 53.2% -27 +186 — 62.2% +0.85 10–5 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.2 -0.44 2009 1759 133.3 +2.15 -0.64 1.020 50.5% -34 -162 -152 58.7% +0.35 9–10 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 104.0 -0.55
27 2014 1774 140.1 -1.37 +3.74 1.048 51.1% -49 +280 — 58.0% +0.40 9–10 (47%) 10–6 (63%) 95.0 +2.02 2010 1533 110.0 -1.99 -4.02 0.807 45.6% +115 -53 +11 23.3% -1.44 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 -0.52
28 2015 1752 137.5 -3.26 +7.03 1.083 52.0% -25 +216 -179 58.6% +0.66 18–11 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 104.0 +3.08 2011 1526 106.8 +0.76 +0.06 0.926 48.6% +77 — +41 40.9% -0.68 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.2 +0.11
29 2016 1657 128.4 -3.45 +3.74 0.989 49.8% +7 +192 -112 49.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 94.9 +0.33 2012 1544 120.7 +2.01 -3.55 0.942 49.0% +9 -66 +104 40.7% -0.48 3–6 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 -0.29
30 2017 1652 117.1 -4.83 +3.87 0.998 49.9% +19 +108 — 53.3% +0.13 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.62 2013 1500 108.6 -0.99 -4.61 0.816 46.1% +48 -61 — 30.0% -1.37 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.51
31 2018 1767 125.7 -0.84 +2.69 0.996 50.0% +17 -5 — 48.5% -0.21 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 1575 92.5 -7.16 -0.74 0.798 44.2% — +37 — 31.6% -1.74 1–2 (33%) — — +0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1607 122.5 -2.17 +3.15 1.053 51.1% — +33 — 55.6% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1575 114.0 -4.44 +2.94 0.966 49.1% -11 +76 — 39.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1607 109.2 -3.27 +0.30 0.881 46.5% — +45 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1548 97.8 -6.59 -1.63 0.755 43.4% -51 +75 -7 24.1% -2.07 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1693 123.6 -4.63 +1.30 0.884 47.1% -121 +82 — 37.7% -0.94 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 106.5 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1590 105.5 -0.55 +0.36 0.771 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 138.5 -1.81 +3.71 1.026 50.6% -25 +106 -122 54.6% +0.29 105–95 (53%) 85–59 (59%) 104.5 -0.06 — 1796 120.5 +0.70 -2.25 0.922 48.4% +30 -76 -4 42.0% -0.58 39–45 (46%) 29–32 (48%) 99.0 -0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.