H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sara Errani vs Misaki Doi H2H: 2-0

Sara Errani holds a 2–0 lead over Misaki Doi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sara Errani leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2017 Roland Garros first round 7-6(7) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Misaki Doi
Japan Age 35 Left-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sara Errani #91 7-6(7) 6-1 Misaki Doi #58 Match data May 30, 2017* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Sara Errani #6 6-3 6-2 Misaki Doi #84 Match data Oct 3, 2013* R32 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Errani #476 #5 5,835 2,005 387 304 56.0% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Misaki Doi #258 #30 1,555 1,734 99 167 37.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Misaki Doi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2010 0–3 0.0% #132 1,475 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,613 0 0 2011 6–11 35.3% #120 1,492 0 0
21 2008 29–22 56.9% #42 1,735 0 2 2012 10–9 52.6% #93 1,552 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,655 0 2 2013 9–15 37.5% #90 1,569 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,722 0 2 2014 5–10 33.3% #124 1,553 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,673 0 2 2015 13–14 48.1% #54 1,657 0 1
25 2012 53–20 72.6% #6 1,897 0 6 2016 20–27 42.6% #40 1,668 0 1
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,885 0 7 2017 9–17 34.6% #122 1,530 0 1
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2018 1–3 25.0% #128 1,571 0 1
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,751 0 8 2019 8–14 36.4% #82 1,644 0 1
29 2016 21–23 47.7% #49 1,656 0 9 2020 1–8 11.1% #83 1,572 0 1
30 2017 18–16 52.9% #144 1,652 0 9 2021 11–21 34.4% #105 1,588 0 1
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,767 0 9 2022 5–13 27.8% #173 1,457 0 1
32 2019 2–6 25.0% #198 1,575 0 9 2023 1–2 33.3% #258 1,488 0 1
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–12 40.0% #121 1,574 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–5 28.6% #109 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–14 41.7% #105 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #476 1,590 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Errani Misaki Doi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2006 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2007 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2008 14 10 24 58.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2010 21 16 37 56.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2011 14 16 30 46.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 9 9 18 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2012 23 14 37 62.2% 28 3 31 90.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2016 11 19 30 36.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
26 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2017 4 10 14 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2018 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2017 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 4 6 10 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 160 338 52.7% 188 115 303 62.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — 68 113 181 37.6% 17 36 53 32.1% 14 18 32 43.8% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 593/692 of Sara Errani's and 241/267 of Misaki Doi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sara Errani Misaki Doi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2006 1/6 0.0 1.0 76.4% 33.3% 38.5% 50.0% 16.7% 34.5% 39.5% 2010 3/3 0.0 2.0 68.2% 56.7% 42.6% 55.7% 13.9% 52.3% 34.8%
20 2007 12/17 0.8 2.3 66.1% 56.1% 48.0% 41.1% 52.6% 53.4% 44.4% 2011 15/17 1.1 3.4 62.4% 60.0% 40.7% 49.6% 40.7% 52.3% 41.7%
21 2008 34/51 0.5 2.7 64.2% 57.6% 46.0% 48.1% 45.8% 53.2% 45.7% 2012 19/19 1.7 3.0 62.4% 62.6% 48.8% 48.0% 42.8% 57.5% 45.5%
22 2009 44/52 0.3 2.5 69.2% 55.6% 44.7% 50.9% 45.1% 52.5% 44.6% 2013 20/24 1.3 3.2 59.3% 61.4% 48.6% 41.7% 39.2% 56.2% 42.1%
23 2010 59/65 0.4 1.5 75.4% 56.2% 44.0% 55.5% 51.2% 53.4% 47.7% 2014 15/15 1.7 2.7 60.4% 62.4% 40.8% 53.7% 46.0% 53.5% 41.4%
24 2011 53/56 0.4 1.9 76.2% 57.7% 47.2% 52.0% 48.6% 55.0% 47.1% 2015 18/27 2.4 2.5 62.7% 61.7% 46.2% 51.4% 59.2% 56.2% 42.3%
25 2012 63/73 0.3 1.1 76.1% 60.2% 49.9% 54.1% 56.5% 57.5% 51.5% 2016 42/47 1.9 2.2 59.9% 61.9% 47.1% 57.8% 41.6% 56.1% 39.3%
26 2013 57/68 0.1 1.1 82.1% 57.9% 48.5% 52.4% 51.1% 56.1% 50.4% 2017 24/26 1.1 1.9 62.7% 59.0% 46.8% 46.7% 40.3% 54.1% 40.0%
27 2014 54/58 0.1 1.2 81.3% 56.1% 45.3% 52.4% 50.1% 54.1% 48.1% 2018 4/4 0.8 2.3 63.7% 59.6% 42.9% 57.1% 52.2% 53.6% 42.4%
28 2015 54/72 0.1 1.4 83.3% 54.9% 50.0% 49.2% 55.4% 54.2% 49.7% 2019 22/22 0.9 3.1 59.9% 60.8% 46.1% 50.0% 54.7% 54.8% 40.3%
29 2016 38/45 0.1 1.2 85.4% 52.9% 43.6% 51.6% 52.4% 51.5% 48.0% 2020 9/9 0.7 4.1 63.4% 58.5% 41.4% 54.0% 41.3% 51.8% 39.5%
30 2017 31/34 0.1 1.3 78.7% 52.5% 41.2% 40.6% 54.1% 50.3% 49.6% 2021 29/33 0.9 2.7 61.8% 58.0% 45.0% 44.7% 51.9% 53.2% 39.3%
31 2018 14/14 0.1 2.9 81.3% 57.5% 36.7% 41.9% 45.6% 53.8% 46.0% 2022 18/18 1.2 3.6 60.4% 60.0% 39.4% 56.5% 46.6% 52.0% 37.7%
32 2019 8/8 0.1 8.0 61.0% 51.0% 28.4% 30.1% 44.3% 42.3% 46.0% 2023 3/3 2.0 1.7 68.4% 64.7% 49.6% 56.6% 34.7% 60.3% 35.7%
33 2020 7/7 0.0 4.6 77.6% 54.9% 39.2% 58.2% 57.5% 51.3% 51.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 19/20 0.1 2.9 78.4% 52.1% 36.1% 52.3% 55.8% 48.5% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 7/7 0.0 1.9 80.7% 52.1% 33.4% 39.3% 47.1% 48.4% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 13/13 0.0 1.5 79.1% 47.8% 31.7% 36.6% 49.8% 44.5% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 23/24 0.1 1.5 77.5% 52.4% 42.3% 41.1% 47.1% 49.8% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2/2 0.0 1.5 82.0% 53.3% 47.6% 49.5% 75.0% 52.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 593/692 0.2 1.7 77.3% 55.8% 44.9% 49.9% 51.1% 53.3% 47.9% — 241/267 1.4 2.8 61.4% 60.6% 45.2% 50.8% 45.4% 54.6% 40.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Errani Misaki Doi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2006 1529 107.3 -2.72 -1.03 0.604 36.7% — +41 — 46.2% -0.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.21 2010 1475 100.7 -0.02 -0.90 0.729 43.5% — — — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.27
20 2007 1614 121.3 -0.77 +0.04 0.953 49.0% -56 +20 — 55.0% +0.43 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -0.20 2011 1492 110.6 -2.09 -1.38 0.872 46.9% +9 — +124 35.3% -0.85 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.29
21 2008 1735 135.4 -1.78 +1.64 0.976 49.4% -49 -6 -147 53.8% +0.34 10–7 (59%) 4–5 (44%) 102.2 -1.64 2012 1552 111.2 +0.40 -0.63 1.068 51.3% -14 — +104 48.9% +0.38 5–2 (71%) 0–3 (0%) 102.4 +1.74
22 2009 1655 132.5 -2.62 +1.07 0.938 48.6% +1 +49 -81 50.9% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 6–3 (67%) 100.5 +0.75 2013 1570 117.8 -0.57 -1.00 0.962 48.8% +1 -75 — 41.8% -0.62 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.40
23 2010 1723 134.3 -2.26 +3.11 1.025 50.6% +16 -53 -104 56.5% +0.29 6–11 (35%) 12–6 (67%) 100.8 +1.24 2014 1553 112.0 -1.33 -1.10 0.890 47.5% -8 — — 35.3% -1.15 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -0.48
24 2011 1673 134.0 -0.30 +3.09 1.047 51.0% -6 +66 -54 54.0% +0.26 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.90 2015 1658 123.9 -1.42 +0.28 0.967 49.9% -22 -122 -54 48.4% -0.26 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 101.8 -0.92
25 2012 1898 155.0 +1.80 +6.73 1.210 54.4% -78 +149 -273 69.0% +1.52 11–5 (69%) 7–3 (70%) 107.8 -1.43 2016 1669 124.6 +0.05 -2.56 0.894 47.9% -39 -94 0 42.7% -0.70 5–8 (38%) 6–3 (67%) 101.2 -0.95
26 2013 1886 156.0 +1.16 +6.37 1.149 53.2% -27 +186 — 62.2% +0.85 10–5 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.2 -0.44 2017 1531 112.4 -1.70 -2.51 0.872 47.2% -31 +75 — 32.1% -1.02 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 99.5 +0.29
27 2014 1774 140.1 -1.37 +3.74 1.048 51.1% -49 +280 — 58.0% +0.40 9–10 (47%) 10–6 (63%) 95.0 +2.02 2018 1571 111.0 -0.62 -0.93 0.914 48.6% +3 — — 36.4% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14
28 2015 1752 137.5 -3.26 +7.03 1.083 52.0% -25 +216 -179 58.6% +0.66 18–11 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 104.0 +3.08 2019 1645 124.7 -1.10 -1.27 0.892 47.9% -30 — — 40.4% -0.65 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.6 +0.04
29 2016 1657 128.4 -3.45 +3.74 0.989 49.8% +7 +192 -112 49.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 94.9 +0.33 2020 1573 110.0 -2.38 -1.23 0.819 45.8% -9 +73 — 29.2% -1.38 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.58
30 2017 1652 117.1 -4.83 +3.87 0.998 49.9% +19 +108 — 53.3% +0.13 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.62 2021 1589 123.1 -2.40 -2.77 0.841 46.3% -9 -27 +70 35.3% -1.09 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 -0.58
31 2018 1767 125.7 -0.84 +2.69 0.996 50.0% +17 -5 — 48.5% -0.21 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 -1.13 2022 1458 108.2 -3.32 -3.02 0.784 45.3% +75 -2 — 29.3% -1.46 3–2 (60%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.02
32 2019 1575 92.5 -7.16 -0.74 0.798 44.2% — +37 — 31.6% -1.74 1–2 (33%) — — +0.92 2023 1489 114.0 -0.38 -0.81 0.899 47.3% +67 — — 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — +0.08
33 2020 1607 122.5 -2.17 +3.15 1.053 51.1% — +33 — 55.6% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1575 114.0 -4.44 +2.94 0.966 49.1% -11 +76 — 39.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1607 109.2 -3.27 +0.30 0.881 46.5% — +45 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1548 97.8 -6.59 -1.63 0.755 43.4% -51 +75 -7 24.1% -2.07 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1693 123.6 -4.63 +1.30 0.884 47.1% -121 +82 — 37.7% -0.94 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 106.5 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1590 105.5 -0.55 +0.36 0.771 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 138.5 -1.81 +3.71 1.026 50.6% -25 +106 -122 54.6% +0.29 105–95 (53%) 85–59 (59%) 104.5 -0.06 — 1734 122.8 -1.24 -1.72 0.894 47.7% -11 -23 +50 38.9% -0.77 36–48 (43%) 23–28 (45%) 98.3 +0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.