H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 1-4

Petra Kvitova holds a 4–1 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2015 Beijing second round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Petra Kvitova
CZE Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 7, 2015* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sara Errani #20 7-5 6-4 Petra Kvitova #4 Match data
Oct 4, 2013* Beijing WTA 1000 R16 Hard Petra Kvitova #7 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 Sara Errani #6 Match data
Feb 24, 2013* Dubai WTA 500 F Hard Petra Kvitova #8 6-2 1-6 6-1 Sara Errani #7 Match data
Aug 25, 2012* New Haven WTA 500 SF Hard Petra Kvitova #5 6-1 6-3 Sara Errani #10 Match data
Jan 27, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Petra Kvitova #2 6-4 6-4 Sara Errani #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,073 501 258 66.0% 2 10 2 14 3 31

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Petra Kvitova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,700 0 1
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,699 0 1
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,058 1 7
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2012 38–15 71.7% #8 1,961 1 9
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,966 1 11
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,989 2 14
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,907 2 17
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2016 41–19 68.3% #11 1,966 2 19
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,894 2 20
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2018 42–17 71.2% #7 1,887 2 25
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2019 33–16 67.3% #7 1,897 2 27
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,947 2 27
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2021 28–17 62.2% #17 1,881 2 28
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,920 2 29
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,931 2 31
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,773 2 31
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —