H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Samantha Stosur H2H: 3-5

Samantha Stosur holds a 5–3 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Samantha Stosur leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Sara Errani leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2016 Charleston fourth round 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 5
8 main draw meetings
Samantha Stosur
AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 8, 2016* Charleston WTA 500 R16 Clay Sara Errani #20 6-4 7-6(5) Samantha Stosur #26 Match data
Sep 6, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Samantha Stosur #22 7-5 2-6 6-1 Sara Errani #16 Match data
Oct 22, 2012 WTA Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Sara Errani #7 6-3 2-6 6-0 Samantha Stosur #9 Match data
Jun 8, 2012* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Sara Errani #24 7-5 1-6 6-3 Samantha Stosur #6 Match data
May 17, 2012* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Samantha Stosur #5 6-3 7-5 Sara Errani #24 Match data
Feb 17, 2011* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Samantha Stosur #5 6-0 6-1 Sara Errani #40 Match data
Sep 5, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Samantha Stosur #6 6-2 6-3 Sara Errani #37 Match data
Aug 27, 2010* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Samantha Stosur #6 6-1 3-6 7-6(4) Sara Errani #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Samantha Stosur
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9