H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sara Errani vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-8

Serena Williams holds a 8–0 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 5–0 on clay and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2015 Roland Garros quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 8
8 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 4, 2015* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Serena Williams #1 6-1 6-3 Sara Errani #17 Match data
May 18, 2014* Rome WTA 1000 F Clay Serena Williams #1 6-3 6-0 Sara Errani #11 Match data
Jun 8, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Serena Williams #1 6-0 6-1 Sara Errani #5 Match data
May 11, 2013* Madrid WTA 1000 SF Clay Serena Williams #1 7-5 6-2 Sara Errani #7 Match data
Sep 8, 2012* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Serena Williams #4 6-1 6-2 Sara Errani #10 Match data
Feb 19, 2009* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Serena Williams #1 4-6 6-2 6-0 Sara Errani #32 Match data
Jan 16, 2009* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Serena Williams #2 6-1 6-2 Sara Errani #38 Match data
May 16, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Serena Williams #6 6-4 6-3 Sara Errani #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 — — — — — — — 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71