H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Sara Errani vs Tsvetana Pironkova H2H: 2-3

Tsvetana Pironkova holds a 3–2 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sara Errani leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Tsvetana Pironkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tsvetana Pironkova won the 2017 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Tsvetana Pironkova
BUL Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 5, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Tsvetana Pironkova #131 6-1 6-4 Sara Errani #76 Match data
May 24, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Tsvetana Pironkova #102 6-3 6-2 Sara Errani #18 Match data
Feb 23, 2016* Doha WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sara Errani #17 1-6 7-5 6-3 Tsvetana Pironkova #103 Match data
Jan 11, 2014* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Tsvetana Pironkova #107 7-6(2) 6-3 Sara Errani #7 Match data
Jan 9, 2009* Brisbane WTA 500 R16 Hard Sara Errani #41 6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 Tsvetana Pironkova #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Tsvetana Pironkova #1,170 #31 1,805 1,770 169 222 43.2% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Tsvetana Pironkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2005 6–3 66.7% #86 1,599 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2006 15–16 48.4% #64 1,662 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2007 7–15 31.8% #95 1,596 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2008 15–17 46.9% #44 1,631 0 0
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2009 9–20 31.0% #97 1,546 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2010 16–15 51.6% #35 1,623 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2011 13–22 37.1% #46 1,644 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2012 19–23 45.2% #42 1,658 0 0
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2013 9–21 30.0% #108 1,561 0 0
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2014 17–19 47.2% #38 1,619 0 1
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2015 18–21 46.2% #59 1,633 0 1
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2016 10–12 45.5% #64 1,671 0 1
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2017 6–10 37.5% #165 1,639 0 1
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2020 6–2 75.0% #136 1,739 0 1
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2021 3–6 33.3% #252 1,706 0 1
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —