H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sara Errani vs Yafan Wang
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Sara Errani vs Yafan Wang.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Errani | #461 | #5 | 5,835 | 2,024 | 384 | 299 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sara Errani | Yafan Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #42 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #47 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #45 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #7 | 1,894 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #14 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #20 | 1,752 | 0 | 8 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,625 | 0 | 9 | 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #144 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #112 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #198 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,597 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #105 | 1,550 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,594 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |