H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Adriana Villagran Reami H2H: 1-1
Sara Gomer and Adriana Villagran Reami are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Adriana Villagran Reami leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1988 San Antonio third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1988* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sara Gomer | 6-3 6-2 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1987* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Adriana Villagran Reami | 6-3 2-6 7-6 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sara Gomer | Adriana Villagran Reami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |