H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sara Gomer vs Belinda Cordwell H2H: 1-2

Belinda Cordwell holds a 2–1 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Belinda Cordwell leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Belinda Cordwell won the 1990 Birmingham round of 32 3-6 6-3 6-4.

GBR Age 62 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 2
3 main-draw meetings
NZL Age 60 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Belinda Cordwell 3-6 6-3 6-4 Sara Gomer #187 Match data Jun 14, 1990* R32 Birmingham Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Belinda Cordwell 6-4 6-4 Sara Gomer #64 Match data Mar 22, 1989* R64 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard
Sara Gomer #48 4-6 7-5 6-2 Belinda Cordwell Match data Sep 23, 1988* R64 Seoul Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Gomer #317 #46 18 1,778 105 132 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Belinda Cordwell 1,829 79 83 48.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Gomer Belinda Cordwell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1980 1–1 50.0% 1,499 0 0
16 1980 2–1 66.7% 1,518 0 0 1982 4–4 50.0% 1,495 0 0
17 1981 7–8 46.7% 1,517 0 0
18 1982 6–4 60.0% 1,545 0 0
19 1983 3–7 30.0% 1,531 0 0 1985 9–9 50.0% 1,582 0 0
20 1984 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0 1986 1–9 10.0% 1,489 0 0
21 1985 10–15 40.0% #101 1,568 0 0 1987 5–7 41.7% 1,516 0 0
22 1986 13–14 48.1% #59 1,660 0 0 1988 20–21 48.8% 1,613 0 0
23 1987 18–19 48.6% #72 1,680 0 0 1989 25–11 69.4% 1,753 0 1
24 1988 20–16 55.6% #51 1,747 0 1 1990 11–14 44.0% 1,641 0 1
25 1989 7–12 36.8% #124 1,638 0 1 1991 3–7 30.0% 1,575 0 1
26 1990 6–8 42.9% #92 1,635 0 1
27 1991 8–13 38.1% #120 1,660 0 1
28 1992 4–10 28.6% #173 1,556 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Gomer Belinda Cordwell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1980 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
17 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1983 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1985 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 9 12 21 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 23 8 31 74.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1988 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1989 1 6 7 14.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1990 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1992 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 47 57 104 45.2% 8 17 25 32.0% 32 39 71 45.1% 7 10 17 41.2% 47 47 94 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 25 22 47 53.2% 3 9 12 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Gomer Belinda Cordwell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1980 1499 102.5 50.0% +0.75 0–1 +0.39
16 1980 1519 104.5 66.7% +0.83 +0.03 1982 1495 105.1 +120 43.8% -0.63 1–1 +1.29
17 1981 1517 109.2 45.5% -0.09 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 +0.09
18 1982 1545 105.7 -19 60.0% +0.55 2–0 +1.20
19 1983 1532 102.6 +81 +22 40.0% -0.92 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.8 +0.59 1985 1583 127.9 +15 +54 51.2% +0.24 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 +0.69
20 1984 1511 108.2 +34 26.7% -1.60 1–2 (33%) 0–2 +0.16 1986 1490 87.6 +47 18.2% -2.68 0–2 1–2 (33%) +0.74
21 1985 1568 117.6 -18 +24 42.9% -0.46 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.6 +1.64 1987 1516 101.4 -30 +90 42.9% -0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +1.13
22 1986 1660 119.5 -6 -213 -39 46.9% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.7 +0.62 1988 1613 122.1 -99 +78 49.5% 0.00 9–10 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 102.0 +1.65
23 1987 1680 131.9 -13 -6 46.3% -0.39 6–2 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 105.2 -0.33 1989 1754 136.4 -43 68.4% +1.21 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 +2.91
24 1988 1747 138.3 -19 -34 53.7% +0.15 6–4 (60%) 9–4 (69%) 108.3 -0.39 1990 1641 107.3 -24 +67 42.6% -0.77 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 103.1 +2.10
25 1989 1639 114.0 -23 -117 +78 43.5% -0.78 2–6 (25%) 1–0 -0.51 1991 1576 105.0 -46 +142 39.1% -0.61 0–3 (0%) 0–2 +0.66
26 1990 1636 113.1 -36 +106 42.4% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.82
27 1991 1661 134.5 -33 +111 40.4% -0.55 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) 97.6 -1.11
28 1992 1557 104.1 +24 -82 34.4% -1.06 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.9 +1.43
Career 1779 127.6 -13 -99 +25 45.3% -0.39 32–35 (48%) 31–30 (51%) 102.3 +1.79 1829 121.3 -45 +83 49.2% -0.09 27–29 (48%) 19–21 (48%) 99.7 +7.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.