Sara Gomer
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |
| Nathalie Herreman | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 24, 1991 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 30, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Louise Allen holds a 2–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Louise Allen leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Louise Allen won the 1992 US Open round of 128 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Allen | 6-4 7-6(3) | Sara Gomer | Match data | Sep 2, 1992* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Louise Allen | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | Sara Gomer | Match data | Jun 24, 1992* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 105 | 132 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Louise Allen | — | — | — | 1,758 | 67 | 100 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Louise Allen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 22–5 | 81.5% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Louise Allen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1982 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1985 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1983 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1986 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1990 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1988 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1991 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 1992 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 47 | 57 | 104 | 45.2% | 8 | 17 | 25 | 32.0% | 32 | 39 | 71 | 45.1% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | — | 40 | 56 | 96 | 41.7% | 4 | 16 | 20 | 20.0% | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Louise Allen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1980 | 1519 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 66.7% | +0.83 | — | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 1517 | 109.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 45.5% | -0.09 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | 102.6 | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 1545 | 105.7 | — | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | 60.0% | +0.55 | — | 2–0 | — | +1.20 | 1980 | 1520 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.40 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.07 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1532 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | +81 | — | +22 | 40.0% | -0.92 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.8 | +0.59 | 1981 | 1540 | 111.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 53.6% | +0.64 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.7 | -0.03 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1511 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | 26.7% | -1.60 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +0.16 | 1982 | 1736 | 132.6 | — | — | — | — | -16 | — | — | 75.4% | +2.03 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–2 (50%) | 103.9 | +2.84 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1568 | 117.6 | — | — | — | — | -18 | — | +24 | 42.9% | -0.46 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.6 | +1.64 | 1983 | 1706 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | — | -183 | -107 | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.80 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1660 | 119.5 | — | — | — | — | -6 | -213 | -39 | 46.9% | -0.28 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.7 | +0.62 | 1984 | 1686 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.11 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1680 | 131.9 | — | — | — | — | -13 | — | -6 | 46.3% | -0.39 | 6–2 (75%) | 5–5 (50%) | 105.2 | -0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 1747 | 138.3 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | -34 | 53.7% | +0.15 | 6–4 (60%) | 9–4 (69%) | 108.3 | -0.39 | 1986 | 1612 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.38 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1639 | 114.0 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -117 | +78 | 43.5% | -0.78 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–0 | — | -0.51 | 1987 | 1565 | 110.9 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -55 | — | 32.0% | -1.28 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | 97.0 | +0.16 |
| 26 | 1990 | 1636 | 113.1 | — | — | — | — | -36 | — | +106 | 42.4% | -0.48 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.2 | +0.82 | 1988 | 1584 | 119.3 | — | — | — | — | -2 | — | — | 45.7% | -0.20 | 3–6 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.4 | -0.03 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1661 | 134.5 | — | — | — | — | -33 | — | +111 | 40.4% | -0.55 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–3 (0%) | 97.6 | -1.11 | 1989 | 1561 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | -23 | — | — | 43.1% | -0.66 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–2 (71%) | 100.1 | +0.22 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1557 | 104.1 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -82 | — | 34.4% | -1.06 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 94.9 | +1.43 | 1990 | 1493 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | — | 21.7% | -1.39 | 0–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.64 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1453 | 100.2 | — | — | — | — | -9 | — | — | 31.8% | -1.54 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +0.75 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1576 | 125.0 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -118 | -27 | 41.8% | -0.80 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–2 (50%) | 103.6 | -0.19 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1452 | 91.9 | — | — | — | — | +19 | +6 | +65 | 20.6% | -2.12 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.2 | +0.76 |
| Career | — | 1779 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -99 | +25 | 45.3% | -0.39 | 32–35 (48%) | 31–30 (51%) | 102.3 | +1.79 | — | 1759 | 120.5 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -89 | -37 | 43.6% | -0.45 | 23–34 (40%) | 18–22 (45%) | 95.9 | +2.92 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |
| Nathalie Herreman | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 24, 1991 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 30, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 10, 1992 | H2H |
| Camille Benjamin | 3 | 1 | 4 | Nov 2, 1989 | H2H |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 16, 1993 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 11, 1992 | H2H |
| Gretchen Magers | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 10, 1989 | H2H |