H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sara Gomer vs Louise Allen H2H: 0-2
Louise Allen holds a 2–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Louise Allen leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Louise Allen won the 1992 US Open first round 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Louise Allen | 6-4 7-6(3) | Sara Gomer | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Louise Allen | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Louise Allen | — | — | — | 1,759 | 67 | 100 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Gomer | Louise Allen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 22–5 | 81.5% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 3 |