H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 01:16 UTC
Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Claire Liu H2H: 2-0
Sara Sorribes Tormo holds a 2–0 lead over Claire Liu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sara Sorribes Tormo leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Sorribes Tormo won the 2022 Toronto second round 7-6(4) 2-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 26
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2025 | Miami | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Claire Liu | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2025 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Claire Liu | 6-4 6-3 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2022* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 7-6(4) 2-6 7-6(5) | Claire Liu | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-2 6-4 | Claire Liu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Claire Liu | #111 | #52 | 1,024 | 1,767 | 45 | 65 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Claire Liu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #141 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #269 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #207 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |