H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Harmony Tan H2H: 1-1
Sara Sorribes Tormo and Harmony Tan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Harmony Tan leads 1–0 on grass, while Sara Sorribes Tormo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Harmony Tan won the 2022 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Harmony Tan | 6-3 6-4 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2022* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-2 6-2 | Harmony Tan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Harmony Tan | #194 | #90 | 743 | 1,681 | 12 | 30 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Harmony Tan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #110 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #142 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |