H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Yafan Wang H2H: 2-1
Sara Sorribes Tormo holds a 2–1 lead over Yafan Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sara Sorribes Tormo leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Sorribes Tormo won the 2024 Cleveland third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2024* | Cleveland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-4 6-1 | Yafan Wang | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2020* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 1-6 6-1 6-3 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2017* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Yafan Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | Yafan Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |