H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sarah Borwell vs Emma Laine H2H: 0-1

Emma Laine holds a 1–0 lead over Sarah Borwell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emma Laine leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emma Laine won the 2005 Quebec City round of 32 6-4 6-1.

GBR Age 47 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
FIN Age 40 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emma Laine #108 6-4 6-1 Sarah Borwell #354 Match data Nov 3, 2005* R32 Quebec City Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sarah Borwell #1,086 #199 133 1,500 2 4 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emma Laine #1,001 #50 429 1,577 21 38 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sarah Borwell Emma Laine
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #843 1,487 0 0
17 2003 0–1 0.0% #870 1,472 0 0
18 2004 1–1 50.0% #166 1,489 0 0
19 2005 4–6 40.0% #92 1,505 0 0
20 2006 13–22 37.1% #74 1,525 0 0
21 2007 2–6 25.0% #247 1,492 0 0
22 2008 1–1 50.0% #399 1,503 0 0
25 2005 0–2 0.0% #288 1,468 0 0
26 2006 2–2 50.0% #250 1,490 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sarah Borwell Emma Laine
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 98.4 0.0% -4.00 -0.01
17 2003 1472 93.0 0.0% -5.00 +0.10
18 2004 1490 103.3 40.0% -1.20 1–0 -0.24
19 2005 1505 106.3 -0.89 -0.92 0.800 44.9% +33 39.1% -1.00 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) -0.01
20 2006 1526 120.2 +0.10 -0.37 1.017 49.8% +30 -49 40.0% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 2–7 (22%) 93.2 -0.40
21 2007 1493 108.2 -2.28 -2.33 0.832 46.0% +33 31.6% -0.84 1–2 (33%) 1–1 -0.07
22 2008 1504 102.0 +0.67 +1.36 0.876 46.8% 50.0% -0.75 -0.04
25 2005 1469 95.6 -0.41 -2.56 0.701 44.9% 0.0% -2.75 0–1 +0.28
26 2006 1491 96.7 +1.11 -1.88 0.864 46.8% +92 40.0% -0.90 2–0 1–2 (33%) +0.14
Career 1500 96.2 +0.81 -2.02 0.833 46.4% +92 28.6% -1.43 2–0 1–3 (25%) +7.00 1578 114.5 -0.50 -0.76 0.943 48.3% +31 -49 37.7% -0.88 7–9 (44%) 5–9 (36%) 95.7 -1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.