H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor vs Evgenia Kulikovskaya H2H: 1-0
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor holds a 1–0 lead over Evgenia Kulikovskaya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor won the 1999 Budapest quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 47
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1999* | Budapest | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 7-5 6-2 | Evgenia Kulikovskaya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Evgenia Kulikovskaya | #1,156 | #91 | 391 | 1,547 | 10 | 32 | 23.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Evgenia Kulikovskaya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #192 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #186 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #827 | 1,395 | 0 | 0 |