H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Selima Sfar vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 0-1
Stephanie Foretz Gacon holds a 1–0 lead over Selima Sfar in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stephanie Foretz Gacon leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Stephanie Foretz Gacon won the 2002 Birmingham second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUN
Age 49
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 45
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2002* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | 6-3 6-2 | Selima Sfar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selima Sfar | #1,005 | #75 | 456 | 1,591 | 21 | 54 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stephanie Foretz Gacon | — | — | — | 1,647 | 61 | 115 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Selima Sfar | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #193 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #281 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |