H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Amy Frazier H2H: 3-0

Serena Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2006 Cincinnati quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 22, 2006* Cincinnati WTA 500 QF Hard Serena Williams #139 6-2 6-2 Amy Frazier #56 Match data
Sep 21, 2002* Tokyo WTA 500 SF Hard Serena Williams #1 7-6(0) 6-3 Amy Frazier #53 Match data
Aug 19, 2000* Montreal WTA 1000 QF Hard Serena Williams #7 6-0 6-1 Amy Frazier #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —