H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Serena Williams vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 2-0

Serena Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2013 Madrid quarterfinal 6-3 0-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2013* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Serena Williams #1 6-3 0-6 7-5 Anabel Medina Garrigues #63 Match data
May 18, 2012* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Serena Williams #6 6-3 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 — — — — — — —
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 — — — — — — —
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —