H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Barbara Schett H2H: 3-0

Serena Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2003 Roland Garros third round 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Barbara Schett
AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 1, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-0 6-0 Barbara Schett #51 Match data
May 9, 2002* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Serena Williams #5 6-3 6-2 Barbara Schett #22 Match data
Aug 13, 2001 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Serena Williams #10 3-6 6-3 6-2 Barbara Schett #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,975 256 227 53.0% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Barbara Schett
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,487 0 0
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,531 0 0
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,585 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,762 0 2
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,936 0 2
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 2000 27–22 55.1% #22 1,815 0 3
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,757 0 3
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,750 0 3
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,624 0 3
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,590 0 3
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,591 0 3
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 — — — — — — —
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 — — — — — — —
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 — — — — — — —
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 — — — — — — —
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —