H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Serena Williams vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 1-1

Serena Williams and Chanda Rubin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 1–0 on grass, while Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2002 Los Angeles quarterfinal 6-2 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 2002* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Chanda Rubin #21 6-2 4-6 7-5 Serena Williams #1 Match data
Jul 3, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Serena Williams #2 6-3 6-3 Chanda Rubin #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 — — — — — — —
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 — — — — — — —
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 — — — — — — —
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —