H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 5-1

Serena Williams holds a 5–1 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 3–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2004 Charleston fourth round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 16, 2004* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #24 (w/o) Serena Williams #9 Match data
May 17, 2003* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Serena Williams #1 7-5 6-2 Conchita Martínez #27 Match data
Apr 11, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-2 Conchita Martínez #25 Match data
Aug 12, 2000* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Serena Williams #7 6-2 4-6 6-2 Conchita Martínez #6 Match data
Sep 7, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Serena Williams #6 4-6 6-2 6-2 Conchita Martínez #17 Match data
May 8, 1998* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Serena Williams #31 6-2 6-2 Conchita Martínez #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —