H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Dally Randriantefy H2H: 5-0

Serena Williams holds a 5–0 lead over Dally Randriantefy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 4–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2005 Amelia Island third round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Dally Randriantefy
MAD Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 7, 2005* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Serena Williams #4 6-3 6-1 Dally Randriantefy #45 Match data
Jan 20, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Serena Williams #7 6-3 6-0 Dally Randriantefy #67 Match data
May 14, 2004* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Serena Williams #7 6-1 6-3 Dally Randriantefy #100 Match data
Apr 10, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-3 6-0 Dally Randriantefy #95 Match data
May 30, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Serena Williams #3 6-2 6-3 Dally Randriantefy #169 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Dally Randriantefy #99 #44 721 1,690 43 66 39.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Dally Randriantefy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 1994 0–1 0.0% #236 1,493 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 1995 3–6 33.3% #95 1,502 0 0
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 1996 6–7 46.2% #114 1,554 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 1997 2–5 28.6% #205 1,541 0 0
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 — — — — — — —
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 — — — — — — —
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 2000 2–1 66.7% #164 1,567 0 0
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 2001 1–4 20.0% #140 1,523 0 0
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2002 1–2 33.3% #93 1,523 0 0
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2003 4–10 28.6% #102 1,522 0 0
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2004 7–9 43.8% #62 1,597 0 0
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2005 17–20 45.9% #68 1,606 0 0
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2006 0–1 0.0% #99 1,585 0 0
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 — — — — — — —
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 — — — — — — —
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 — — — — — — —
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 — — — — — — —
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —