H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Serena Williams vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 5-0

Serena Williams holds a 5–0 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2012 Cincinnati third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Eleni Daniilidou
GRE Age 43 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 2012* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Serena Williams #4 6-3 6-4 Eleni Daniilidou #121 Match data
Jul 22, 2004* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Serena Williams #16 6-1 7-6(3) Eleni Daniilidou #33 Match data
Mar 29, 2004* Miami WTA 1000 SF Hard Serena Williams #6 6-4 6-4 Eleni Daniilidou #35 Match data
Feb 8, 2003* Paris WTA 500 SF Carpet Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-0 Eleni Daniilidou #18 Match data
Jan 22, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-4 6-1 Eleni Daniilidou #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Eleni Daniilidou #1,070 #14 1,639 1,878 185 203 47.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Eleni Daniilidou
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 — — — — — — —
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 2001 5–8 38.5% #81 1,506 0 0
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 2002 32–22 59.3% #22 1,778 0 1
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 2003 32–24 57.1% #26 1,706 0 2
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 2004 21–19 52.5% #34 1,683 0 3
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 2005 14–20 41.2% #69 1,638 0 3
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 2006 27–24 52.9% #36 1,720 0 4
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 2007 27–29 48.2% #42 1,720 0 4
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2008 8–8 50.0% #144 1,700 0 5
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2009 0–1 0.0% #157 1,677 0 5
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2010 2–3 40.0% #165 1,666 0 5
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2011 6–12 33.3% #90 1,566 0 5
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2012 8–21 27.6% #100 1,483 0 5
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2013 3–10 23.1% #186 1,431 0 5
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2014 0–2 0.0% #414 1,412 0 5
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 — — — — — — —
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 — — — — — — —
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —