H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Serena Williams vs Francesca Schiavone H2H: 7-2
Serena Williams holds a 7–2 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 5–0 on hard courts, while Francesca Schiavone leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2013 Beijing third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
7
–
2
9 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 46
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2013* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Serena Williams | 6-4 7-5 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Serena Williams | 6-0 6-1 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2013 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Serena Williams | 6-3 6-2 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
| May 13, 2009* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Francesca Schiavone | 6-4 0-0 (ret.) | Serena Williams | Match data |
| May 8, 2008* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Serena Williams | 6-2 6-3 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Serena Williams | 6-3 6-4 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
| May 12, 2005* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Francesca Schiavone | 7-6(2) 6-1 | Serena Williams | Match data |
| Mar 21, 2003* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Serena Williams | 7-5 6-1 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Serena Williams | 6-3 6-3 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serena Williams | #320 | #1 | 13,615 | 2,405 | 825 | 170 | 82.9% | 23 | 23 | 5 | 17 | 3 | 71 |
| Francesca Schiavone | #486 | #4 | 5,246 | 1,984 | 439 | 367 | 54.5% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Serena Williams | Francesca Schiavone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1997 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1998 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #20 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 37–7 | 84.1% | #4 | 2,170 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #6 | 2,174 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 40–7 | 85.1% | #6 | 2,259 | 1 | 10 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 57–5 | 91.9% | #1 | 2,348 | 4 | 18 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #80 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 36–3 | 92.3% | #3 | 2,369 | 6 | 22 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,192 | 6 | 24 | 2002 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #41 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #11 | 2,028 | 7 | 25 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 12–4 | 75.0% | #95 | 2,016 | 7 | 25 | 2004 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #7 | 2,058 | 8 | 27 | 2005 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #13 | 1,952 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,109 | 9 | 31 | 2006 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #15 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #1 | 2,106 | 11 | 34 | 2007 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–4 | 86.2% | #4 | 2,149 | 13 | 36 | 2008 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #30 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 22–4 | 84.6% | #12 | 2,155 | 13 | 38 | 2009 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2012 | 48–6 | 88.9% | #3 | 2,239 | 15 | 44 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #7 | 1,898 | 1 | 4 |
| 31 | 2013 | 77–5 | 93.9% | #1 | 2,345 | 17 | 55 | 2011 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,819 | 1 | 4 |
| 32 | 2014 | 52–10 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,209 | 18 | 62 | 2012 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #35 | 1,687 | 1 | 5 |
| 33 | 2015 | 50–6 | 89.3% | #1 | 2,197 | 21 | 67 | 2013 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,722 | 1 | 6 |
| 34 | 2016 | 36–5 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,177 | 22 | 69 | 2014 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #78 | 1,619 | 1 | 6 |
| 35 | 2017 | 8–1 | 88.9% | #22 | 2,172 | 23 | 70 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,562 | 1 | 6 |
| 36 | 2018 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #16 | 2,078 | 23 | 70 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,594 | 1 | 7 |
| 37 | 2019 | 25–8 | 75.8% | #10 | 2,052 | 23 | 70 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #91 | 1,619 | 1 | 8 |
| 38 | 2020 | 16–5 | 76.2% | #11 | 1,991 | 23 | 71 | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,501 | 1 | 8 |
| 39 | 2021 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,950 | 23 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #320 | 1,891 | 23 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | — | 23 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |